Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching staff should be on the hot seat


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

I've been as big a fan of Rhule as anyone here but frankly these losses have been downright embarrassing and unacceptable for a team with our talent. Constantly shooting ourselves in the foot throughout every single phase of the game is entirely on the coaching staff. If it were just 1 player here and there making mistakes ok, but it's been numerous players on O, D and STs, for multiple games now. We got lucky to hang on against a couple shitty teams when we made unacceptable 2nd half mistakes, and lost to 2 teams we easily should've beaten. Super Bowl caliber NFL head coaches don't have this crap happen consistently like this. Rivera-esque head coaches have this crap happen consistently. Tepper has been quoted saying it takes time to build a program, 5 years, blah blah blah. But fact of the matter is when you have disturbing trends like this, those won't go away in 2-3 years, those years will just be wasted. We saw it with Rivera. I'm sure Tepper is losing his patience too after seeing his team blow away good starts to the season in every year he's owned the team. Rhule and company badly need to turn it around ala Rivera in 2013 otherwise we need to let Fitterer pick his own coaching staff.

Talent? We've have a bottom 5 QB, you aren't going to get many wins until we get an above average QB

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has the head coaching gene, but I'm just a bit pessimistic it's an NFL caliber one.  He's really well suited for the college ranks.

Doesn't seem to pick the right staff.  He's all about the atmosphere and intangibles but not so much with the tangibles.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...