Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith said the reason for the drops was cause they were hospital balls, Chris Simms also eluded to it.


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think we need to try and get a QB from this 2022 crop. We have precious little draft resources left and our OL needs are critical and much easier to hit on than a QB. 

Perhaps a FA QB would be available that is an improvement from Darnold. I'm all for that route, as well. Preferably a solid veteran and not a reclaimation bust.

How are the FA G/C looking this offseason? I wouldn’t be against paying up for one or two and drafting a QB. I know people won’t like this, but we can sign/trade DJax for draft capital too. Henderson should be getting healthy, Taylor looks good, and Horn will come back. We might sign Gillmore to a longer deal too…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

How do you expect the QB to process what is happening when he has instant pressure to deal with?

Peyton Manning in his prime would look like a scrub behind this Oline. 

This is the problem, people keep making excuses for him. 

Several of us posted stats during the offseason that a lot of people just chose to ignore.

Historically with a CLEAN pocket he has been bad, very bad.

If you QB can't play well when things go right, that is a bad sign.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think we need to try and get a QB from this 2022 crop. We have precious little draft resources left and our OL needs are critical and much easier to hit on than a QB. 

Perhaps a FA QB would be available that is an improvement from Darnold. I'm all for that route, as well. Preferably a solid veteran and not a reclaimation bust.

Again I've been mulling this reply and outside of maybe getting Russell Wilson or Gardner Minshew I don't see anyone with arm talent out there. 

I don't think they can bring in Watson.

 

Who do you see that's better and possibly available? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

Again I've been mulling this reply and outside of maybe getting Russell Wilson or Gardner Minshew I don't see anyone with arm talent out there. 

I don't think they can bring in Watson.

 

Who do you see that's better and possibly available? 

I know and in reality we tried to be bold and get Matt Stafford, but he brushed the Panthers off. Free Agents will need to want to come here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Again I've been mulling this reply and outside of maybe getting Russell Wilson or Gardner Minshew I don't see anyone with arm talent out there. 

I don't think they can bring in Watson.

 

Who do you see that's better and possibly available? 

Tyrod Taylor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

I know and in reality we tried to be bold and get Matt Stafford, but he brushed the Panthers off. Free Agents will need to want to come here.

Sam looks bad because the offensive line is historically bad.

Quality quarterbacks don't want to play here because the offensive line is historically bad.

It's almost like there's a single, precursor issue we need to resolve if we want to see improved quarterback play.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I suspect it is a lot of your ignore list because they pop up in just about every WR/QB/OC thread. At least the contingent is getting smaller.

He isn't to blame for the drops. The hospital balls(he threw two) he is to blame for. But, that goes back to his processing difficulties. He isn't to blame for the shitty blocking. He isn't to blame for the shitty playcalling.

But, he is still the second biggest issue on that side of the ball.

I doubt anyone with half a brain would dispute that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

Most of the drops were not hospital balls.  They were just drops. The floater to Marshall over the middle where he got hurt was a hospital ball. Darnold led him right into the safety.

That’s what he did to DJ to open up the came.  Was throwing him into the S.  

and then you end up with WRs knowing Sam isn’t good enough to protect them.   Which is what Tom Brady talks about. 

Darnold didn’t have a good game and he was a contributing factor in some for the drops.  Not all.  But clearly some.   Especially 2 of DJ’s. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He is worse than Darnold by far.

No he’s not. Come on, now.

 

Anyways, it’s looking like we’ll be looking for a QB again this upcoming offseason. Sam has processing issues, and he’s not as accurate as some would like you to believe. The same folks who would complain of holding onto the ball, accuracy/timing issues of our past QBs, are really seeing that now. Sam isn’t the only problem facing this team, but he’s one of the bigger issues. We absolutely would be foolish to give him 3 years. This is his 4th year in the league, and it’s clear he’s not getting it. It’s not clicking. Best to move on.

Edited by AggieLean
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone likes to look for a singular person to blame when things go bad but that isn't how it works.

Pass hits receiver in hands, should receiver be expected to catch it?  Of course.

but

Over the course of a season an accurate QB is going to have less drops than an inaccurate QB ,if everything else is equal, because the accurate QB is making it easier on his receivers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...