Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Texans have had serious trade talks regarding Deshaun Watson with Dolphins, Eagles, and Panthers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Wes21 said:

Let's take a second to look at his first "win" as a Dolphin.  It was against the Rams.  He threw for 93 yards.  Pay extra close attention to the number of plays ran and yards gained.  Does this look like a QB who had a good game?  He literally punted every single possession of the 2nd half.🤣

image.png.e99027dedeb46d14d444b70afe6f6fbd.png

Now let's look at his loss to Denver that year.  He threw for 83 yards despite playing all but 2 drives of the game.  He got benched for Fitz.  Here's the drive chart.  He had a bunch of 3 and outs and punts...with one real drive for a field goal and a short field TD the D set up with an interception.  I marked out the last 2 drives because they were Fitz.  Does this look like a QB who had a good day? 

image.png.1b679513571ce98a37c0217b512df673.png

Here is his "win" against the Raiders.  He had 94 yards passing despite playing all but the last 3 drives of the game...where Fitz came in and scored on all 3 of them while putting up twice the yardage of Tua with close to half the passing attempts.  Fitz won this game after Tua got benched.  Does this look like a QB who had a good day?

image.png.1e392d883aae667078dd14d435380bd3.png

Okay.  You cherry picked some bad stuff from the 13 games of a young QB on a bad team.  

No one is saying he is Aaron Rodgers right now or on  pace.  You can cherry pick a lot of disatrous stuff for a lof of QBs that haven't played a full season yet.  Trevor, Fields, Wilson.  That's just this class.  Go look at Sam's rookie year.  Hell, just look at Sam's last season....think he pulled off 3 INTs, a FL and 2 of those were pick 6s all in a half of football.

They have been able to win with Tua.  That says somehting.  Good completion %.  Good endzone to turnover ratio.  Again, he is just a couple games into his career with a bad team.   Yeah, there is plenty of bad there.  There is suppose to be. 

Point isn't that he is great, point is you don't see teams so boldly moving on from what Tua is and has been yet.   We got peoploe to this day doing mental gymnastics on Sam Darnold and Tua can't even get 16 games lol. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Are we really so desperate to win that we're willing to cheer on a serial sexual predator? Honestly, I'm not. I mean, I stumped for Watson for a long time. But 20+ women aren't all lying. Assuming they can all prove they provided Watson with massage services that alone is a huge red flag and that's something former players have pointed out as well.

Is that’s what we’re calling him?

I mean we had a racist and sexual predator as a owner for 25 years and didn’t win poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Is that’s what we’re calling him?

I mean we had a racist and sexual predator as a owner for 25 years and didn’t win poo. 

I think his point was that we just managed to rid the franchise of said racist and predator...and we're going to just go right back and acquire another one to be the Face Of The Franchise? 🤷‍♂️

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenwo2 said:

I think his point was that we just managed to rid the franchise of said racist and predator...and we're going to just go right back and acquire another one to be the Face Of The Franchise? 🤷‍♂️

To help us win games? Absolutely. Worked for Pittsburgh. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Speaking to Pat Leonard of the New York Daily News, Panthers head coach Matt Rhule said he hasn't "done any work" on other quarterbacks leading up to the trade deadline. 

"I believe Sam (Darnold) will be a great quarterback for the Carolina Panthers," Rhule added.

Oh poo he is getting cut….

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Speaking to Pat Leonard of the New York Daily News, Panthers head coach Matt Rhule said he hasn't "done any work" on other quarterbacks leading up to the trade deadline. 

"I believe Sam (Darnold) will be a great quarterback for the Carolina Panthers," Rhule added.

I mean, what "work" needs to be done on Watson?  Hes one of the top 5 QBs in the NFL.  Period.  Hes a known commodity at this point. And notice he didnt say that Fitty hasn't done any work on any other QBs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, joemac said:

I mean, what "work" needs to be done on Watson?  Hes one of the top 5 QBs in the NFL.  Period.  Hes a known commodity at this point. And notice he didnt say that Fitty hasn't done any work on any other QBs...

So he's NOT lying!!!!!!

Oh Rhule you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Are we really so desperate to win that we're willing to cheer on a serial sexual predator? Honestly, I'm not. I mean, I stumped for Watson for a long time. But 20+ women aren't all lying. Assuming they can all prove they provided Watson with massage services that alone is a huge red flag and that's something former players have pointed out as well.

That's where I am.  I guess a lot of Huddlers don't have daughters or don't respect their wives.  I'd rather win zero playoff games for the next decade than win ten superbowls with Watson.  

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning teams take chances on guys. You see consistently good franchises sign guys with troubles literally every year if they think they can help the team win. Kansas City just gave Josh Gordon is 14th chance in the league. Woman abusers are welcomed back as long as they are good. But god forbid the Panthers take a chance on DeShaun and try to move above mediocrity. Someone else will sign him and he will win. And most of this stuff will be forgotten about. 
 

Rinse and repeat. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...