Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport believes Watson will be traded before the deadline


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

The same fans that have been complaining about mediocrity are the same ones that don’t want to take a chance on a superstar QB. Let’s just follow the same ole panthers way, because its worked so well for us in the last 25 years. 

Some of us aren't complaining about mediocrity and don't want to pay the price for Watson or deal with his baggage. This team has seen what happens with a superstar QB and a meh team around him. Three winning seasons. It just doesn't work.

Build the OL and improve the other weak areas of the team. Then go all in on a QB when they think they're truly ready to make a Super Bowl run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

LA has proven several times over that they don't care about the NFL, yet the NFL keeps trying to crack that large market nut.

Can't really say that about the Rams. They currently have 99.4% attendance, and average the 8th highest tickets sold in the NFL this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Madwolf said:

Can't really say that about the Rams. They currently have 99.4% attendance, and average the 8th highest tickets sold in the NFL this year.

They still have that new car smell and are winning, so of course people are showing up just as they did in the past. Once the new has worn off and the team isn't doing as good, the LA crowd will abandon them in droves just as they have previous teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Some of us aren't complaining about mediocrity and don't want to pay the price for Watson or deal with his baggage. This team has seen what happens with a superstar QB and a meh team around him. Three winning seasons. It just doesn't work.

Build the OL and improve the other weak areas of the team. Then go all in on a QB when they think they're truly ready to make a Super Bowl run.

Much easier said than done. There’s a lot of things this franchise needs to fix. Seems like there is a new problem every season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

This would be a long term move for a 25 year old elite qb. This season doesn’t matter long term. It’s what happens if he’s still on the exempt list the following season. You gotta think the org has talked to the league and also legal counsel if they’re willing to give up that much draft capital and players for one guy only for him to be banned from the league. If they didn’t and are just winging it then this will be a disaster of epic proportions. I just don’t see us doing that unless we’ve had clarity. 

Hell I’d trade for him with this plan:

Work with him and his lawyers to settle his cases. 10 million dollar fund for the victims to just make all of it go away. 
 

Immediately suspend him for 10 games aka the remainder of the season. And put out a joint statement that he will spend the remainder of the season undergoing counseling and sensitivity training. Would have him go on the Ray Rice apology tour. 
 

Deal with all of that this season because we’re going to lose anyway. Then next year you go into the season with a young franchise QB whose paid his debt for his actions and be ready to play football. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

They still have that new car smell and are winning, so of course people are showing up just as they did in the past. Once the new has worn off and the team isn't doing as good, the LA crowd will abandon them in droves just as they have previous teams.

The Chargers are 10th in total average attendance and their percentage is 99.0%.

I think LA supports football (and everything else) just fine.  Or at least just as much as most other NFL fan bases.

Kind of hard to blame San Diego fans. They were essentially the Lions until Marty came in, led them to success, and then fired him and watched it all burn all the way down back to Lions level again for years and years until they moved to LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

The Chargers are 10th in total average attendance and their percentage is 99.0%.

I think LA supports football (and everything else) just fine.  Or at least just as much as most other NFL fan bases.

Kind of hard to blame San Diego fans. They were essentially the Lions until Marty came in, led them to success, and then fired him and watched it all burn all the way down back to Lions level again for years and years until they moved to LA.

LA has always been Lakers Town and they seem happy to be that, especially since they have the guys on the Lakers that are there now. The two NFL teams there now will be ran out of town just as the past franchises were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Hell I’d trade for him with this plan:

Work with him and his lawyers to settle his cases. 10 million dollar fund for the victims to just make all of it go away. 
 

Immediately suspend him for 10 games aka the remainder of the season. And put out a joint statement that he will spend the remainder of the season undergoing counseling and sensitivity training. Would have him go on the Ray Rice apology tour. 
 

Deal with all of that this season because we’re going to lose anyway. Then next year you go into the season with a young franchise QB whose paid his debt for his actions and be ready to play football. 

He doesn't want to do that because he feels he is innocent. He has the money to settle these claims. He doesn't want to. Because he think's he is innocent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

He doesn't want to do that because he feels he is innocent. He has the money to settle these claims. He doesn't want to. Because he think's he is innocent. 

Last thing I heard was he was gonna pay out to the accusers but he wanted it to be public and they didn’t. Not sure if that’s true but weird. Usually it’s the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I don't care if he ever plays another down of football.   Some things are bigger than a damn football game.  He is a dumbass at the very least and a sexual predator at worst.  I will never watch that dude play.

Fair enough, I'm just confused as to why you wouldn't support a team for letting him play but will continue to support a league that will let him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...