Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport believes Watson will be traded before the deadline


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, joemac said:

So your general hypothesis here is that we would pretty much be the same offense with Deshaun as we are with Sam?!?

No, it has nothing to do with Darnold.  It is about selling out in hopes that disturbingly troubled player can save this franchise.  I want no part of a team that thinks like that.  If you do then I wish you luck.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Last thing I heard was he was gonna pay out to the accusers but he wanted it to be public and they didn’t. Not sure if that’s true but weird. Usually it’s the other way around.

Ah. Do you have any sources for that? I thought he was adamant about not paying because he thought they'd make him appear guilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ImaginaryKev said:

The NFL has two teams in LA that are good, they're not losing sleep over anyone protesting Deshaun Watson

True…especially since out of 10,000 emails Gruden was the “only one” who was caught.

….whole place is compromised

Edited by firefox1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Hell I’d trade for him with this plan:

Work with him and his lawyers to settle his cases. 10 million dollar fund for the victims to just make all of it go away. 
 

Immediately suspend him for 10 games aka the remainder of the season. And put out a joint statement that he will spend the remainder of the season undergoing counseling and sensitivity training. Would have him go on the Ray Rice apology tour. 
 

Deal with all of that this season because we’re going to lose anyway. Then next year you go into the season with a young franchise QB whose paid his debt for his actions and be ready to play football. 

Now I actually like this idea.  Get him on the team, and then officially suspend him for the rest of the season.  Who cares?  Not like we're making the playoffs this year anyways.  Then, next year is when it can FINALLY start to all come together, and we have a well-rested superstar QB ready to take over the NFC South for the next 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Ah. Do you have any sources for that? I thought he was adamant about not paying because he thought they'd make him appear guilty. 

Yea it was in the video posted earlier in here I believe with Florio on NBC sports

Or maybe it was in one of the other 352.8 Watson threads

^
Mage just posted it

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mage said:

That's extremely weird. I mean the desire for disclosure should be a credit to Watson, right? 

His side is so confident that they demand everything be public? Doesn't Buzbee have a questionable past? What a weird case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

Fair enough, I'm just confused as to why you wouldn't support a team for letting him play but will continue to support a league that will let him play.

I don't support the league willingly. I'm forced to pay the cable company and my streaming service to watch the Panthers games.  I don't watch other teams play very often except maybe a couple of playoff games.  I didn't even watch the lady SB.  That should give you an idea of my support level of the NFL.

I didn't watch Peyton or Rothlesbuger and both should have accounted for their behavior.  I had not control over that and I have no control over who supports who.  The only thing I can control is my participation in this saga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kuhndog94 said:

That's extremely weird. I mean the desire for disclosure should be a credit to Watson, right? 

His side is so confident that they demand everything be public? Doesn't Buzbee have a questionable past? What a weird case. 

It's hard to say.  I think it is best to avoid judgment and assumptions right now, but that isn't the society we live in (and no, this is not me saying I think Watson is innocent... I do think he's definitely guilty of something, but that something won't become clearer until later if it ever does)

It is possible they want it to be public because they weren't going to pay much for the settlement, which could give off the impression that the accusations weren't that much.  On the other end, Buzbee might feel that making the settlement public does more harm to the women than keeping it private.  So while it is a weird switch of things, I don't think we can make an assumption about what it means for either sides as far as being in the right vs wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

He doesn't want to do that because he feels he is innocent. He has the money to settle these claims. He doesn't want to. Because he think's he is innocent. 

Doesn’t matter if he’s innocent or not. You pay to make it go away, it’s an investment in your ability to make more money, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

So is trading for a QB that a lot of folks think will magically make things better.

Making one move is a lot easier than planning on fixing an entire unit in one off season. I’m not saying the OL isn’t a problem. That would be stupid. But even when our current QB does have time, he botches it. Watson wouldn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, t96 said:

Panthers and Dolphins only ones in the mix.

And Peter King reported Monday that Dolphins owner Stephen Ross "is not pushing his football people to deal for Watson right now."

https://www.nbcsportsedge.com/football/nfl/player/8073/deshaun-watson

 

Ron Paul - It's Happening GIF [IMGUR] - GIF on Imgur

Why the f*ck are you excited?

or rather why would ANYONE be excited?

Maybe if Watson didn't have these legal issues, there would be reason for this but he DOES have legal issues and won't be on the field for perhaps 1-2 seasons (maybe more if he ends up serving Jail-time)...

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...