Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady on the hot seat.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

This reminds me of that one time Rivera babied Washington and well we all know how that ended. You guys remember that? Rivera took over the Defense but had Washington 'watch' what he was doing and hold a clipboard? 

 

fuging grown ass men can't do their jobs and their boss comes in a does it for them. Like bro, you got paid to watch someone do your work for you. 

Well, Rhule was OC at Temple. If he really feels like he needs to step in, he literally does have that ability. 

IMO, I don't think you will see that happen. I suspect they all know that the offense is just not recoverable with the current OL/QB situation. Better to have Brady take the fall and can him than take over those duties mid-stream and keep failing.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Darnold's play is mucking up the clarity of everyone's situation, that's for sure.

The Oline and Wr deserve some big blame to...

So does the injury prone star of this team..

Example..

Derrick Henry covers up alot in Nashville..

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

No it was Brady. Stop with the it's every ones fault except Brady. It's his fault he put a poo offense together. 

What fantasy world are you living in exactly?

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That's my question..

I'll put Darnold on Rhule but Teddy was Brady's guy all day..

Well, according to one of the Huddle's Insiders, they claim Teddy was a Hurney guy.

I don't think we will ever truly know who was more at fault for any of those decisions. I just know that the guy getting paid the most loot and who is supposedly the final say on personnel is ultimately responsible.

If these people below you suck at making these decisions(Brady, Hurney, etc) why the fug are you listening to them? Why did you hire them?

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Waldo said:

All those seats should be hot. This is truly a team effort in failure.

I hope Tepper gave Rhule the same talk.

I think Tepper used more...."colorful" language to Rhule like "You better f*cking get this ship righted NOW or your ass is grass and I'm the Lawnmower, bitch!"

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...