Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady on the hot seat.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
Just now, glenwo2 said:

I think Tepper used more...."colorful" language to Rhule like "You better f*cking get this ship righted NOW or your ass is grass and I'm the Lawnmower, bitch!"

I would give up two seats to any remaining games to sit through that meeting with an alcohol drink in my hand. Hell, take the rest my tickets this year.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

I think Brady could stand to get better, but I don’t know if it would be the right move to can him yet. I think Brady has realized he can’t do what he wants or needs to do with Darnold.

Yeah he should get a chance with OL and/or QB upgrades and a healthy McCaffrey 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, chbright said:

Could it be Joey B was saved by 2 guys: Joe Burrow @ LSU and Sean Payton @ NOLA?

No, not saved...  but I do believe having an entire offense of playmakers that went between the 1st and 2nd rounds certainly made him look a lot better than he is.

No coincidence Ogeron was dismissed possibly quicker than any other head coach after winning a championship in the modern era, either...  I just think they had a ton of great NFL talent that carried them.

And all that I do know is, Brady is not an NFL coach or coordinator at this point in his career.  And I say that as possibly his biggest advocate before we hired him...  it's just surprising because from what I read, he really did make the majority of their calls that really mattered there, but I guess the talent discrepancy was just that big in LSU's favor.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

I’m really not opposed to Rhule or Sean Ryan calling the offense. Look at Sean Ryan’s resume. He has coached Eli Manning, Deshaun Watson, and Matthew Stafford. He’s also been in the league a while and coached multiple positions.

I really think the only reason Joe Brady hasn’t been canned is because it would derail his career. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted
Just now, Cdparr7 said:

I’m really not opposed to Rhule or Sean Ryan calling the offense. Look at Sean Ryan’s resume. He has coached Eli Manning, Deshaun Watson, and Matthew Stafford. He’s also been in the league a while and coached multiple positions.

I really think the only reason Joe Brady hasn’t been canned is because it would derail his career. 
 

 

03F8FCC0-79EB-4FA4-8D14-497220E5CA4C.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

No, not saved...  but I do believe having an entire offense of playmakers that went between the 1st and 2nd rounds certainly made him look a lot better than he is.

No coincidence Ogeron was dismissed possibly quicker than any other head coach after winning a championship in the modern era, either...  I just think they had a ton of great NFL talent that carried them.

And all that I do know is, Brady is not an NFL coach or coordinator at this point in his career.  And I say that as possibly his biggest advocate before we hired him...  it's just surprising because from what I read, he really did make the majority of their calls that really mattered there, but I guess the talent discrepancy was just that big in LSU's favor.

Burrow is tearing it up now in only his second season. They also had Edwards-Helaire and Justin Jefferson. The talent level on that offense was insane and way above almost anyone they played that season. Pretty much anybody could have called plays for that group to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

No, not saved...  but I do believe having an entire offense of playmakers that went between the 1st and 2nd rounds certainly made him look a lot better than he is.

No coincidence Ogeron was dismissed possibly quicker than any other head coach after winning a championship in the modern era, either...  I just think they had a ton of great NFL talent that carried them.

And all that I do know is, Brady is not an NFL coach or coordinator at this point in his career.  And I say that as possibly his biggest advocate before we hired him...  it's just surprising because from what I read, he really did make the majority of their calls that really mattered there, but I guess the talent discrepancy was just that big in LSU's favor.

Biggest difference is at LSU, they were one of, if not the highest percentage team in the country of only leaving 5 in to block. Opened up so much in his scheme to have 5 route-runners, including a stellar route-running back in CEH. 

Now he's got a bottom 5 OL in the league and, without CMC, a totally useless pass catching backfield. Oh yeah and a QB who probably eats crayons for breakfast. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dave Gettleman's Shorts Mentor

Dave Gettleman's Shorts

Posted
Posted

Besides Teddy being captain check down and choking in the clutch last season, our offense in 2020 was not bad. Last year, our passing game revolved around quicker and short passes with slant routes and drag routes in spread formations. Sorta similar to the Saints offense. Robby was more effective last year with having a majority of catches last year from quicker routes and yards after catch along with Curtis being money on third downs.

This year, it seems that we are running longer developing routes combined with our poor offensive line and Darnold decision making.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...