Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I get why some didn't want Watson, but it's not a happy time.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

i don’t understand why this FO and staff just thought they could hand pick pick their qb

like

this team averages 6 wins a season since 2017…take out 2017 and it’s like barely 5 lol

any worthwhile qb FA is going to have a choice  and they’re not going to choose this fuging Browns 2.0 skid mark…

yea, surprise Tep, free will is a thing, should’ve drafted mac jones and picked up and extra second rounder at that

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's apparently some conflict among sources as to if Watson rejected the Panthers, or if the Panthers didn't want to match the Dolphins offer.  Not saying anyone in particular is right or wrong, but I suspect we'll be back in the mix in the offseason if he isn't traded before the deadline.

I'm not happy in any way. I was very concerned with acquiring Watson because of the accusations against him, but I also don't want to keep watching the garbage heap that is this offense anymore.

This season feels completely lost 7 weeks in.  The entire offense looks like they've quit. Darnold can't play, Brady can't call plays, the OL sucks, we have more drops than any other team in the league...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

First off, Deshaun Watson apparently rejected the Panthers. Let that sink in! I guess we weren't offering enough free special massages (and, yeah, that remark is the result of some saltiness)! Anyway, there will be no strike three--Matt Stafford, Watson--because the only way Aaron Rodgers is coming to Charlotte is to whip our asses with whatever big market team he's playing for. The same can be said for Russell Wilson. So basically we're fuged unless we get lucky.

We're in QB hell--not purgatory, but H-E-L-L! Our crusade for a franchise QB has landed us on a fuging raft without a sail. We are at the mercy of whatever winds blow our way. Who knows where the fug we'll end up? There is no answer on the roster! Darnold isn't it. PJ Walker? He could throw a ball from the middle of the ocean and somehow still miss the ocean. 

I get why some of you are happy, but this isn't a happy time. Not saying that there isn't a college prospect that won't turn out to be a legitimate franchise QB--because all of them have flaws and are looking shaky--but after seeing us push some chips in on the likes of Teddy Bridgewater and especially Sam Darnold, do you really have any faith that Matt Rhule and company will be able to separate the wheat from the chaff? I mean, I get taking a chance and outwardly being optimistic, but giving not one but two suspect QBs more than a year's worth of a contract and throwing good money at what has a high risk of being bad is an equation for failure. And, like I alluded to, there might not even be a legit franchise QB in the 2022 draft. But, like I also alluded to, maybe we can get lucky. Maybe we can have some dumb luck instead of just dumb decisions for once pertaining to our signal caller. 

As it stands now, we may have to continue this cycle and hope. Hell, I'd rather watch Cam, Minshew, Garropolo, or whatever retread with a pulse--err, upside, than watch what we have now. fug! Who am I kidding? I'm going to watch it. I am. But my expectations will be that of a Jets fan. 

Maybe, just maybe we can get lucky. And maybe, just maybe, Rhule and Fitterer will be able to build a team that will attract a decent starter by 2025 (if they last that long). 

I'm not gonna lie. This is the lowest I've felt as a Panthers fan ever. And you may not appreciate it, but that's saying something. I love the Panthers, and I will never jump ship--or in this case, the raft--but they are losing me on some level. The fire in the belly, the hope, the being on edge and at a moment's notice to defend the team, rationalize the moves, and wax on about how we're building something is being lost. Maybe it's just a temporary rant, or perhaps something more. I don't even know at this point. It's certainly not happiness. There is no giddiness at the thought of being in franchise QB wilderness, regardless of whatever preceded it.

Welcome to the wonderful world of rooting for a true poverty franchise. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. For most teams in our situation, QB hell can last years or decades. Finding an Elite QB is 95% pure luck.

2. We’re not going to be able to build through FA. We need to build through the draft. That’s where our big players will come from.

3. If Rhule and co stick around, it will take them a few more years to become savvy enough in the ways of the nfl to compete. He needs a former HC at the OC spot to speed up this process.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
    • Management accounting for strategic decision making takes center stage in the business world. Dive into the intricate realm of financial data analysis and its pivotal role in shaping organizational strategies for success. Learn how key performance indicators, budgeting, and cost-volume-profit analysis drive informed decision-making, leading to sustainable growth and competitive advantage. Overview of Management Accounting for Strategic Decision Making Management accounting plays a crucial role in helping organizations make strategic decisions by providing valuable financial information and analysis. It involves the process of identifying, measuring, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating financial information to support management in making informed decisions. Importance of Management Accounting in Guiding Strategic Decisions, Management accounting for strategic decision making Management accounting is essential for guiding strategic decisions as it provides insights into the financial health of the organization, helps in assessing performance, and aids in forecasting future outcomes. By utilizing management accounting techniques, organizations can effectively allocate resources, identify areas for improvement, and evaluate the impact of strategic decisions on profitability and growth. Cost analysis: Management accounting helps in analyzing the cost structure of the organization, identifying cost drivers, and determining the profitability of products or services. This information is crucial for making pricing decisions and optimizing the use of resources. Budgeting and forecasting: Through budgeting and forecasting, management accountants can help organizations set realistic financial goals, monitor performance against targets, and adjust strategies as needed to achieve desired outcomes. Performance measurement: Management accounting enables organizations to track key performance indicators (KPIs), measure performance against benchmarks, and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies in achieving organizational objectives. Examples of How Management Accounting Influences Strategic Planning Management accounting influences strategic planning in various ways, such as: Scenario analysis: Management accountants can create different scenarios based on varying assumptions to help organizations evaluate the potential outcomes of different strategic decisions and choose the most favorable course of action. Capital budgeting: Management accounting techniques like net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are used to evaluate investment opportunities, assess their long-term financial impact, and prioritize projects that align with strategic goals. Variance analysis: By comparing actual performance against budgeted or expected results, management accountants can identify areas of concern, investigate deviations, and recommend corrective actions to ensure strategic objectives are met.
    • What is Management Accounting? The main objective of management accounting is collecting and analyzing operational data, transforming it into actionable insights for strategic and operational decision-making. This involves detailed analysis and reporting on revenue, costs, budgets, and performance metrics, enabling management accountants to forecast trends, support budget preparation, perform cost analyses, and guide financial decisions within the organization. Importance of Defining the Scope of Management Accounting Understanding the scope of management accounting is important for the following reasons: Leaders gain financial insights for strategic decision-makin   Operations become more streamlined and productivity increases Effective business strategy planning and execution are facilitated Financial risks are identified and mitigated effectively Organizations can set and achieve performance improvement goals Adherence to financial regulations and standards is ensured Opportunities for cost savings and better resource management enhance value creation The integration of new technologies improves efficiency and analytical capabilities Scope of Management Accounting The scope of management accounting covers the following: 1. Variance Analysis Variance analysis comes under the scope of management accounting. It involves tracking differences between budgeted and actual figures and analyzing the causes and implications of these variances. This helps management understand why variances occurred and their potential impact on future operations. This detailed analysis typically includes various types of variances such as sales volume, material cost, labor efficiency, and overhead variances, each providing specific insights into different areas of business performance.
×
×
  • Create New...