Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ramsey, Donald, and now Miller


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

The Rams were pretty good with a decent Goff.

The Lions sucked consistently with a much better QB than Goff in Matthew Stafford.

They switch and the Lions still suck while the Rams are better than they were with Goff and Stafford looks like he's a kid again.

Von Miller may be in the twilight of his career, but let him play situational downs opposite Aaron Donald and he'll have an immediate impact.

hopefully people will realize you can’t just plug in a good QB on a garbage team and franchise and expect results

but they probably won’t 

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jmac said:

Stafford made the right choice taking the Rams over Carolina.  Von Miller to LA is crazy. That guy totally beat the sh%t out of us in the SB and now he is with those two monsters.

L.A going all in and the Bronco's fans must be sick with this trade. Definitly the favorites to take it all now.

No, Rivera & Shula totally beat the sh%t out of us in the SB by not blocking him over and over again, while calling developing plays that took longer to develop that the QB had to throw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

They have a bleak, bleak future. My goodness. No first rounder until what? 2024? And just traded another 2nd and 3rd. They better win a Super Bowl these next few years, or that franchise will be in shambles.

Nah man kinda like the Lakers they’ll always be a destination free agents want to go to they don’t need draft picks as much as franchises like ours do. As long as they hit on their later round picks and they do an outstanding job of that mixed with good trades/free agent pick ups they’re going to be more than alright. Super interesting (to me) how they build their roster.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CashNewton22 said:

Nah man kinda like the Lakers they’ll always be a destination free agents want to go to they don’t need draft picks as much as franchises like ours do. As long as they hit on their later round picks and they do an outstanding job of that mixed with good trades/free agent pick ups they’re going to be more than alright. Super interesting (to me) how they build their roster.

Great point. Certainly seems like the exception and not the rule. I think Miami could pull this off but Ross runs a terrible organization. I don't think anyone else could pull this strategy off and be as successful.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Malt Liquor said:

As much as I can't stand Von Miller as a football player, the Rams look like superbowl contenders to me.

They do, they do, but right now a lot of teams in the NFC look like legit contenders (GB, Tampa, Arizona, Dallas). The way injuries are hitting the league right now, any one of those teams could falter before the playoffs.

This is a weird, weird year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waldo said:

Great point. Certainly seems like the exception and not the rule. I think Miami could pull this off but Ross runs a terrible organization. I don't think anyone else could pull this strategy off and be as successful.

For sure it’s definitely not a strategy most any other team could pull off. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...