Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is QB3 in next years draft?


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm going to try and be positive here.

The Darnold experiment had 3 possible outcomes.

Option A:  He plays great, we pay him a lot of money and he becomes our franchise level QB for the next 10 years.

Option B:  He plays terrible, we eat next years cap hit and we look for a new QB.

Option C  He plays just good enough to win, when everything else goes well, and we pay him big money to be average.

Its looking like Option B, which is better than Option C.

There are some really bad teams this year ahead of us in the draft but I could see us drafting in that 8-12 range which might open up the possibility of QB 3 for us.  Who are we looking at?

 

Edited by AU-panther
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate UNC so it’s not easy for me to say but Howell is the best QB in this draft. He won’t go first. Corral is okay, Willis is below average, Hartman and Howell is where it’s at. 
 

I hope we get one of those two and that’s not easy to say being a Wolfpack fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, this year is a bad year for trying to draft a qb. Rattler looks like he needs another year. Howell plays a very simple one read offense. Corral has some interesting skills but im not convinced and ive watched him play about 10 times now. 

Malik Willis? Hes a lot better now, than at Auburn, but if he were a first riund draft pick it would have been obvious at Auburn that he had legit talent, it wasnt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...