Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things are not well on Mint Street.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Gotcha...

...but there's nothing "hostile" about that.

The Appaloosa Model hinges on performance & accountability -- if those 2 conditions make a person uncomfortable they should seek employment elsewhere from the Panthers. 

Dude, this is an appaloosa model: 

70s & 80s Appaloosa | 70th Anniversary Model - BreyerHorses.com

 

 

Edited by Panther'sBigD
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

That and Robby. Spent $40M guaranteed when we could have easily waited till the season was over. Smart people in a rebuild should take a measured approach.

We guaranteed $40M to soothe an easily scared of ghosts guy and to soothe a whiner.

Then they keep saying poo  on the broadcast like "Matt Rhule said they need to get Robby involved"

Like wtf he's a deep threat WR not a premiere option at all. Like not at all. He may not even be a number 2 TBH. Moore is a 1 for sure but I see RA as a Ginn who should be your 3 for the deep threat.

Why would you be trying to "get Robby going" lol. Like when was he ever dat dood like a Smitty or any WR that would have a comment attributed to them like that. I mean yeah he hit 1k but barely scores TDs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Oh yea check where the Patriots point out where the run is going and go right there before the snap.

Now watch it over and over again on other plays and say we have an NFL OC.

Luke literally called out virtually every play, from every OC he faced.   

I bet Gilmore can tell you most of the routes coming his way too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Luke literally called out virtually every play, from every OC he faced.   

I bet Gilmore can tell you most of the routes coming his way too. 

 

Difference being Luke is a HoFer and these LBs we face are largely whoevers or anybodies in terms of being an actual NFL LB.

So yea when any starting NFL LB can just call our your OCs poo its a problem. And is a major fugin problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Gotcha...

...but there's nothing "hostile" about that.

The Appaloosa Model hinges on performance & accountability -- if those 2 conditions make a person uncomfortable they should seek employment elsewhere from the Panthers. 

Tepper needs to be taking a long hard look in the mirror. Yeah, I'm fine with demanding a high level of performance and accountability but Tepper has to accept that it looks like he's failed massively in putting the right people (and perhaps right processes) in place to begin with.

You know, kinda what I said with both of our QB moves. It's a problem when I'm sitting on the couch beer in hand laughing at the moves and correctly calling how they're gonna turn out. I'm talking specifically about the moves at QB and the OL acquisitions. They were obviously horrible moves. It might be time to realize we're not smart enough to outsmart the rest of the league on this stuff.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Difference being Luke is a HoFer and these LBs we face are largely whoevers or anybodies in terms of being an actual NFL LB.

So yea when any starting NFL LB can just call our your OCs poo its a problem. And is a major fugin problem

You put a dumpster fire QB on the field and I can predict a poo ton of plays by an OC from my couch.   

especially if the opposing coach has admitted publicly he can’t pass and needs to run and play D to not get blown out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

You put a dumpster fire QB on the field and I can predict a poo ton of plays by an OC from my couch.   

especially if the opposing coach has admitted publicly he can’t pass and needs to run and play D to not get blown out.

Just remember that the ones saying Brady needs to be fired were the ones telling people Darnold was gonna be good here and it was worth the 2nd rounder. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Tepper needs to be taking a long hard look in the mirror. Yeah, I'm fine with demanding a high level of performance and accountability but Tepper has to accept that it looks like he's failed massively in putting the right people (and perhaps right processes) in place to begin with.

You know, kinda what I said with both of our QB moves. It's a problem when I'm sitting on the couch beer in hand laughing at the moves and correctly calling how they're gonna turn out. I'm talking specifically about the moves at QB and the OL acquisitions. They were obviously horrible moves. It might be time to realize we're not smart enough to outsmart the rest of the league on this stuff.

Its obvious by the drafting and free agency moves that they thought they could be productive offensively based on scheme.  Whereas defense needed personnel.  Like you said it is probably a bit of a reality check for them coming from college.

Maybe they learn from it and become better coaches.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put a dumpster fire QB on the field and I can predict a poo ton of plays by an OC from my couch.   

especially if the opposing coach has admitted publicly he can’t pass and needs to run and play D to not get blown out.

TB wasn't a dumpster fire last year and had something to say when he left and is not a dumpster fire in Denver.

One middling QB and one poo QB. 

The defense knows what's coming which will make everything worse on top of already last in OL/QB

Definitely not asking anyone questions. Its a fact his poo is figured out and trash. So you can keep responding with the nothing you respond with and it wont' change Brady into an NFL OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...