Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O Line Talent Evaluation


CWalker4205
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 

We are bad at finding offensive talent atp.  Hard to deny this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

I do wonder just how different our offense would have looked this year if we had gone Slater/Smith. 

DJ had Slater over Sewell and many thought he would be just fine at tackle. Can't cry over spilled milk, but seeing how we ended up with Gilmore and Henderson via trade, and Taylor looks like a long-term piece, it is frustrating. Not to mention taking a long-snapper instead of a need at guard while Jansen is still doing his thing.....pretty pathetic.

I say this as a huge fan of Horn too. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Just imagine

Slater-Jordan/Elflein-Creed Humphrey-Trey Smith-Moton

Even one of those moves would hold a drastic difference on our line. The whole Trey Smith falling in the draft was absurd to me and never understood why we didnt take him later in the draft.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

Even one of those moves would hold a drastic difference on our line. The whole Trey Smith falling in the draft was absurd to me and never understood why we didnt take him later in the draft.

The most frustrating part is we took a FRIGGEN LONG SNAPPER over him, while Jansen is still playing at a high level and the interior line continues to be an issue.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Is it just me or do we suck at finding talent on the O line, no matter who our GM is? 
 

The Steelers are starting a 3rd round rookie at center, 4th round rookie at LT, and Trai freaking Turner at RG and they are keeping a clean pocket for Rothlisberger, and he’s a damn statue.

Every damn year it seems like there are rookies starting all over the league and we have 2 rooks who can’t sniff the field.

 


And yet, according to these stats, their pass blocking is worse than us.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not worth the time/pining thinking about Trey Smith.  Slater, yes, is a legit LT/G we should have taken over Horn.  The second being Sam Cosmi over Marshall Rd2 and not trading down.  Would have been a perfect Rd1-2. 

It's all pointless at this stage, but we've got 70th overall in Brady C. and then Moton.  Brady isn't even a for sure future G for us but at least still has the potential IMO for a long term LG.  We have an entire line to build.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Qu1million said:

We still need a QB

Draft QB round 1. Thats what is going to happen. Rhule will be forced to keep Darnold due to contract and we will have to draft a QB. Thats what is going to happen even if we don't want it to because Rhule will be on the hot seat. It's why we need to start discussing this years QB class. Dan Morgan was just at Pitt this weekend watching Pickett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was curious so just glancing at drafts from franchises with somewhat consistent top olines like saints, browns, post luck colts, patriots, cowboys, Bucs…

the amount of olineman in general drafted is actually pretty much on par somewhat, I mean some of those teams draft olineman at least once every draft with a top half pick, and even double dip

but what I notice is their later rounds, they’re able to find real talent such as patriots finding Onwenu in the 5th last year meanwhile we took some unknown CB (shocking)

add that to the fact Panthers make the absolute worst oline FA decisions…can anyone name a good FA olineman that played for average or above more than a single year in our entire history? I can’t 

so I would say it is a lack in the ability to evaluate talent, coach talent, and lack of trying in the draft and severely overreaching/poor evaluation in FA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I disagree. For better or worse Bryce likes to throw floaters to predetermined areas regardless of what the reciever is doing and bringing those down is XL's bag. I wanted Ladd but I think this was right call. Burners and slot recievers are a dime a dozen but legit jump ball specialists are not.
    • ZCode Review (2024 UPDATED): An In-Depth Look at the Sports Betting System ZCode Review (2024 UPDATED): An In-Depth Look at the Sports Betting System Introduction ZCode has been a topic of much discussion in the sports betting community. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the ZCode system, examining its features, effectiveness, and user experiences. VISIT ZCODE OFFICIAL WEBSITE FOR BEST DEAL : https://rebrand.ly/zcode-system-webpage What is ZCode? ZCode is a sophisticated sports betting system that offers predictive analytics to assist bettors in making informed decisions. It's not just a betting platform but a comprehensive system that combines data analysis, expert insights, and community-driven strategies. The Technology Behind ZCode ZCode employs advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze vast amounts of sports data. This includes player performance, team statistics, and historical trends, enabling the system to generate accurate predictions for various sports events. Key Features of ZCode Data-Driven Predictions: Utilizes extensive sports data for accurate betting predictions. Automated Betting Systems: Features a range of automated systems for different sports. Community Insights: Offers access to a community of experienced bettors and sports enthusiasts. Performance Tracking: Provides transparent records of system performance and betting outcomes. Educational Resources: Includes tutorials and guides to help users understand and utilize the system effectively. How ZCode Enhances Sports Betting Informed Betting Decisions: Helps bettors make decisions based on data, not just intuition. Diverse Sports Coverage: Offers predictions for a wide range of sports, appealing to various betting interests. Strategic Betting: Aids in developing more strategic and successful betting approaches. User Experiences and Testimonials Users have shared positive feedback about ZCode, highlighting its effectiveness in improving betting strategies and the value of the community and educational resources. Subscription Costs and Value ZCode is a subscription-based service. Potential users should consider the cost against the benefits of enhanced betting predictions and community support. FAQs About ZCodeQ1: Is ZCode suitable for all levels of sports bettors? A1: Yes, ZCode is designed to be user-friendly for both novice and experienced bettors. Q2: Can ZCode guarantee winning bets? A2: While ZCode increases the chances of successful betting, it cannot guarantee wins due to the unpredictable nature of sports. Q3: How frequently are ZCode predictions updated? A3: The system regularly updates its predictions to reflect the latest data and trends. Conclusion: Evaluating ZCode's Impact on Sports Betting ZCode stands out as a comprehensive tool for sports bettors, offering a blend of data-driven predictions, expert analysis, and a supportive community. It's a valuable resource for those looking to enhance their betting strategies with informed decisions.   Visit the Official ZCode Website for More Information and Access https://rebrand.ly/zcode-system-webpage
×
×
  • Create New...