Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MNF - Fields


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Don’t sleep on Robby whenever we get a new qb. Not saying he’s gonna be a 1k yarder but he’s not this bad. I didn’t want to sign him to a second contract fwiw but he’s not as bad as the stats show. Sam has just full on imploded any opportunity for him to come back from the drops and make plays.

it got poo'd on this offseason.  But I still feel Robby was the lone man in FL while the team was here practicing because of a contract battle.  Robby wanted to get paid before Sam came in and tanked his value.   Which it totally would have done.  

No way to know for a fact, but if Robby hadn't gotten paid he would have been screwed trying to get a deal after being reunited with Sam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cookinbrak said:

That we have a better record than Chicago. And the way you went back to find my posts tells its not only Justin's nectar you want.

We do have a better record than Chicago.

Which fan base do you think feels better about their 2022 season right now, Carolina or Chicago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

it got poo'd on this offseason.  But I still feel Robby was the lone man in FL while the team was here practicing because of a contract battle.  Robby wanted to get paid before Sam came in and tanked his value.   Which it totally would have done.  

No way to no for a fact, but if Robby hadn't gotten paid he would have been screwed trying to get a deal after being reunited with Sam.  

That’s not far fetched. He saw him for 3 years before or whatever. Smart on Robby. 
 

the only dumb thing I said about Sam before the season started was I thought he’d have a career year here with Brady’s system. Not that that’s saying much as his best year was like 19 tds and 13 picks. But I thought he’d hit the mid 20 range. Bradys system is extremely qb friendly so that just shows you how inept Sam is. I don’t think Sam is gonna play many more games for us this season tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cookinbrak said:

That we have a better record than Chicago. And the way you went back to find my posts tells its not only Justin's nectar you want.

 

Just now, trueblade said:

We do have a better record than Chicago.

Which fan base do you think feels better about their 2022 season right now, Carolina or Chicago?

Chicago also has a much more difficult schedule. They have no back to back road or home games. Every week it’s rotated. 
 

Chicago has defeated the Raiders and Bengals. That’s two wins over .500 clubs. Our only win against one was New Orleans. 
 

Chicago is trending up. We are trending down. Chicago is blocking better now that they have their rookie 5th rounder playing and they should get Jenkins to play soon. They will have a young QB and two young Tackles to go with him from the same draft class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

That we have a better record than Chicago. And the way you went back to find my posts tells its not only Justin's nectar you want.

You have a track record of dragging Cam through the mud over the years too. But praise and comparisons to hall of fame qb's just a few months ago for Darnold.

GIF by Team Coco

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CRA said:

Big drive by Fields to take the lead with a minute left.  He keeps taking steps forward each and every week.   

last two weeks he is looking pretty good for rookie of late.

Even if we had taken Fields, i am not sure he would have reached any of his potential behind our pitiful OL and coaches that seem to have no clue on game planing. 

Fields would have probably ended up as shell shocked here as Sam Darnold became with the Jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KatsAzz said:

Even if we had taken Fields, i am not sure he would have reached any of his potential behind our pitiful OL and coaches that seem to have no clue on game planing. 

Fields would have probably ended up as shell shocked here as Sam Darnold became with the Jets.

Fields made some pretty great throws on the run last night. I think he would've fared better than Darnold. Darnold is damaged goods. He already had shell-shock. Happy feet. 

But instead we have a staff who got fleeced by the Jets and picked up Darnolds 5th year option on top of that. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...