Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we lose to Atlanta does Tepper fire Rhule


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Head coaches have a learning curve too.  Especially ones new to the NFL.  

That’s what Urban Meyers’ two fans in Jacksonville are claiming too.  

not sure which deserves to be fired first.  Probably Urban.  But both clearly aren’t NFL guys.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Nah Brady was the fall boy this year, Rhule gets another year no matter what. We won’t get that lucky.

Agreed. The only thing that makes me second guess this is if he’s on the fence and Fitterer gets in his ear and tells him he can’t afford to wait. That the QB options will need to be developed (bc we aren’t going to be able to trade for one) so we need someone who is a QB expert when we draft one this year. If Fitterer sees this team as an LA Rams (Goff) situation where a rookie QB contract allows him to build an elite roster I think you have to fire Rhule and hire someone like the Rams did with McVay. A guy who is going to make his QB great…and the rest of the pieces basically are just so good they really don’t need as much attention. If that makes sense. 
 

Top three candidates imo:

Byron Leftwich

Kellen Moore 

Brian Daboll

Get one of those guys and get a QB who can sling it. 

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I would hope we put Gilmore on Pitts leaving then with no real weapons and get the win. More importantly, BC better be playing with Brown getting some reps as well. If neither are good enough to beat out this current crew, we wasted some draft picks. 

Probably need Gilmore on Patterson this time.  Patterson is the Atl offense.   It all goes through him.  

question will be can they cover Pitts if Gilmore takes out Patterson.  Which he will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Approaching the end of his second season I would expect to be seeing progress on that curve. 

I agree.  But I also think it’s hard to truly gauge his ability to prepare a team with no QB, the worst OL in football, and an inept OC.  With the OC gone, time will tell if there is any improvement.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrianS said:

If Rhule is let go, odds on it won't happen until after the season.  There is no benefit.  College coaches have already moved around.  Pederson is the only unemployed NFL coach out there, and we can't talk to employed coaches.  What's the point?

Same overall point that firing Joe Brady achieved.  

It’s been a game of mitigating the boos at BOA for some time now.  Tepper had a problem with it IMO.   Last two home games the boo birds have had massive impact.  Got to think Tepper has made it known that is a problem. 

One thing Rhule has in his favor is 3 of the 5  remaining are on the road.  

Atl game is huge.  Think Cam can save Rhule.   Then Rhule gets boo’d out loudly vs Tampa but won’t have to return to BOA after that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect we will have the same gameplay we had the last time we played them and run the ball. 
But plans usually don’t work twice in a row and I think the Falcons will be better prepared. 
If we lose to the Falcons Matt should be fired. But Matt should of been fired 3 weeks ago. So I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t get fired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think losing to Atlanta seals the deal for Tepper, but I'm sure he pulls the trigger that quickly.  Things probably starts moving behind the scenes and once we are officially/mathematically eliminated Rhule is gone.  It may take 3 more weeks with how crazy this season is turning out.  Even losing to the Falcons, it's very odd that a 5 win team wouldn't be eliminated with only 4 games remaining.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...