Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article about Packers OC Nathaniel Hackett


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mentioned it elsewhere, but thanks to an NFL rule change made earlier this year, any team that fires a coach midseason can start interviewing prospects for their next head coach two weeks before the season ends.

Tepper fired both Rivera and Hurney in season, so if he is ready to move on from Rhule it'd be no surprise to see it happen before the year is over.

Granted, that's a huge "if"...

Swing open the doors, let Rhule bounce once at the curb, then find this guy to hire!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coach will live a die by the coordinators he chooses.  Whoever the next HC candidate is for the job better have great answers to that question.  As many have pointed out being a good coordinator does not equate to a great head coach.  A great motivator is only part of the job. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thread is fail....sounds an awful lot like Rhule when we were looking at him. Some of you have a very short memory

2 hours ago, HammerinCameron said:

Yeah I’m sure it’s not just Aaron Rodgers making Hackett look good .. are you serious?

OC’s are so overrated .. great players on offense make OC’s

Also this...come on guys. You actually think Bieniemy is a good coach too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hackett definitely seems good on paper.  

I would be extremely happy with the choice, but the realist in my also knows that every year some "hot coordinator" gets a HC job and they often fail.

Everyone keeps thinking in terms of two options, keep Rhule, Fire Rhule, but there could be a third.  What if Tepper keeps Rhule unless he knows for sure he can get the next coach he wants?

For example Tepper might be willing to make a change for Hackett, but if not you wait another year.  I'm not saying that is what you should do, but sometimes when you fire a guy its dependent on who you have lined up to replace them.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The coach will live a die by the coordinators he chooses.  Whoever the next HC candidate is for the job better have great answers to that question.  As many have pointed out being a good coordinator does not equate to a great head coach.  A great motivator is only part of the job. 

I've looked at some of his associations. Here are a few of the options.

For offensive coordinator...

Packers QB Coach Luke Getsy - considered a young coach on the rise, one article said he's "bound to get a coordinator job soon"

Raiders OC Greg Olson - longtime West Coast OC with a solid rep, worked with Hackett in Jacksonville

Jaguars OC Brian Schottenheimer - if the Jags staff is let go, former associate of Hackett's dad Paul via his dad Marty

On the defensive side...

Packers DB Coach Jerry Gray - veteran DC with a good resumé

Raiders DC Gus Bradley - worked with Hackett in Jacksonville and Fitterer in Seattle

Titans Senior Defensive Assistant Jim Schwartz - one of the top defensive minds in the league, worked with Hackett back in Buffalo (my top choice)

Former Packers DC Mike Pettine - previous Packers colleague, has been a good DC but was fired in Green Bay

Bills LB Coach Bob Babich - was DC with Hackett in Jacksonville, long and solid resumé going back to being Ron Rivera's successor in Chicago

Wade Phillips - needs no introduction, worked with Hackett's dad, wants to be a DC again but up there in years

Lotta good position coach possibilities too...

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HammerinCameron said:

Remember when you wanted Dan Campbell

I’m not sure if you are saying this disparagingly, but Dan Campbell has looked more than OK with absolutely nothing in Detroit. His team has been fighting and in a ton of games they have had no business being in. 
 

If he can draft well and get the right qb, he’s gonna make for a good coach in Detroit. 
 

If you want to jump Mr Scot’s poo, there is plenty of source material based on his feelings about Brandon Beane when he was originally rumored to be Marty’s successor. 

Edited by bigdog10
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...