Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It’s this week or next


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

We are looking at this as fans of NFL football and  of the game itself.  Im not saying I'm happy or OK with the job thus far by Rhule.

 

If we are so trigger happy to get rid of a coach in just 2 years, I think we MAY become less attractive to "Proven" coaches. I think it shows dysfunction in the organization. We just might end up getting another college coach.

 

Sure, you can get millions by being hired, but proven coaches have already earned millions. They are stuck in their ways, they don't want to pick up and move, only to move again in 2 years. I think the veterans of the game will also look for stability. If you want to keep hiring newbies, well keep firing coaches every 2 years.

 

While the Panthers as an organization have not fired coaches every two years, but if Tepper fires Rhule, well then he has since owning the panthers.

 

Just a different perspective, probably a huge reach. Just seems the most successful organizations have stability. Of course you can argue they have stability because they have success.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PeteRozelle said:

We are looking at this as fans of NFL football and  of the game itself.  Im not saying I'm happy or OK with the job thus far by Rhule.

 

If we are so trigger happy to get rid of a coach in just 2 years, I think we MAY become less attractive to "Proven" coaches. I think it shows dysfunction in the organization. We just might end up getting another college coach.

 

Sure, you can get millions by being hired, but proven coaches have already earned millions. They are stuck in their ways, they don't want to pick up and move, only to move again in 2 years. I think the veterans of the game will also look for stability. If you want to keep hiring newbies, well keep firing coaches every 2 years.

 

While the Panthers as an organization have not fired coaches every two years, but if Tepper fires Rhule, well then he has since owning the panthers.

 

Just a different perspective, probably a huge reach. Just seems the most successful organizations have stability. Of course you can argue they have stability because they have success.

 

 

Rivera was here for 8 years, not exactly the same situation as Rhule. Sometimes if you know the HC is the wrong one, it’s not a bad thing to admit your mistake and move on.
 

As far as not being able to attract a good coach because of how Rhule was treated with only getting 2 years….what about Kyle shanahan going to the 49ers after giving Chip Kelly one season? Freddie kitchens only got one year and the browns cut bait and clearly upgraded with Stefanski. Mike malarkey only had 2 years in Tennessee, before they hired Mike Vrabel who likely will have his 3rd playoff berth in 3 years. Steve wilks only got 1 year from the cardinals before they ended up getting Kliff kingsbury. I know we have an inferiority complex, but I think we can and will do better than Matt Rhule.

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just my opinion, so take it for what it's worth. I think Bryce decides who he's throwing to before the snap too often instead of reading what he sees post snap. Now alot of that is trying to influence the safety, but if the safety doesn't bite, he gets stuck and it turns into Bryce trying to make a play off schedule as the other options are gone. Cam did the same thing when Kelvin and Smitty were in the game. Bryce sees the field. He just gets a little stubborn sometimes. And that's when he gets himself into trouble. That and he doesn't trust guys to make plays on 3rd down. Instead of throwing to the open guy and letting them get the remaining 3-5 yards for the first, he'll wait until he can throw a guy to the markers. I don't think those physical limitations that keep being brought up is that real for him. Well... until he gets tackled and fumbles the ball at an alarming rate. But he has a strong enough arm, sees the field, and doesn't get injured by regular hits. 
    • Panthers win of course.  Like every Sunday I still have the hopelessly optimistic mindset  😎  
    • You do realize that first play was at 9:16 and they scored a TD before the 2 minute warning. 7 minutes is not a super long drive to come out with a TD. Longer developing plays is what helped get Carolina in the situation they were in. So you're suggesting they should have kept calling the same plays that weren't working? Are you suggesting Bryce keep throwing the same passes that weren't being completed? They were not in soft zone coverage. For comparison, this is Carolina's first defensive alignment in the 3rd quarter, and that's with only 1 WR on the field.  Cardinals were in a normal alignment/depth to stop run or pass. Not a soft zone to give underneath passes to TEs/RBs only. The LBs would likely be closer to 10 yards deep and the DBs more like 15-20 yards in that scenario. 
×
×
  • Create New...