Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Buccaneers at Panthers GameDay Thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Cam with a duck.  Bucs putting everyone within 15 yards of LOS.  They know Cam won’t throw deep.  They are dating him.

Moton hit his arm.

And I don't think the loading the box is exclusive to Cam.  Again, he threw 50+ yards in the air on a rope several time last season, so he is capable...  defense had started doing the same poo to us when Sam was in there before his injury...  I think its because the offense just doesn't scheme for deep passes - Zylstra said as much in the post game presser last week that we're trying to dink and dunk, hit stuff underneath, run RPOs, and get the ball into the hands of our playmakers quick and let them create from there and then they believe it will open up everything else from there...  but it never does.  This offense is schematically poo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DIO84 Enthusiast

DIO84

Posted
Posted

lol and STILL people just refuse to blame Cam for anything.  Dude has zero business being on a football team.  Go with Sam, just ride out the season, spend in FA, and build the o-line.  I don't think there's a decent enough QB to draft.  As for Rhule and the coaching staff, I'm not as full of hate for him as others, but I'm not confident in this FO to hire anyone worth a damn.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

So original.   How dare someone critique the qb after he throws a bone headed pick after throwing multiple dangerous passes before that one.  Obviously racist.

 

There haven't been multiple dangerous passes. There's literally been the one ill advised throw, the pick. Tight throws that were really well defended are not dangerous in the implied sense here. Cam was doing well up to the pick

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...