Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person is not the hero we wanted, but he is the hero that we need.


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd like to believe Dave Tepper has learned a lot about the pro game during these last two years and wouldn't make the same mistake twice when it comes to hiring a head coach. 

The next few weeks will tell the tale. 

If Dave fires Matt at season's end, hope will be renewed. 

If not, Panthers fans will likely have years of misery and failure ahead of them. 

TL/DR:  Life is way too short to support a dysfunctional franchise.   

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CRA said:

Person has been good all year. But he has been really good since camp doing his job and since leaving the Observer. 
 

 

Agreed. He’s been great since joining the Athletic. He’s not a breaking news guy which for some reason bothers people. But he’s a very good writer, and that’s what I prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree. We've all seen Joe stumble haphazardly through practices and ask endless idiotic questions in pressers, but good for him on this one. Exposing the embarrassments of a billionaire that owns the team you make a living covering when no one else will is walking a dangerous line in terms of your career. Good for Joe.

 

 

He just might have more fan in him than we expected. Stir that pot Joe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I'd like to believe Dave Tepper has learned a lot about the pro game during these last two years and wouldn't make the same mistake twice when it comes to hiring a head coach. 

The next few weeks will tell the tale. 

If Dave fires Matt at season's end, hope will be renewed. 

If not, Panthers fans will likely have years of misery and failure ahead of them. 

TL/DR:  Life is way too short to support a dysfunctional franchise.   

I won't. I will just watch a lot less Football and a whole lot more Hockey. You know the Hurricanes are pretty good and usually score as much as the Panthers too. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huddle used to rip Person (with good reason) but he’s been really good since joining the Athletic.  His persona is so interesting.  A clueless man, I remember an interview with a player he wasn’t a part of, and he just walks through staring at his phone without a care in the world.  Joe Person being our hero is so fitting.  Thank you, Joe.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...