Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT to announce new name 2/2/22


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Washington Football Team to unveil new name and logo Feb. 2 (nfl.com)

Finally, the wait is almost over and we at least know that Football Team will NOT be the new name as well as Wolves nor Redwolves.

They have a hype video which I think offers a clue as to what the new name will be. 

I'm guessing that they will be known as the Washington Generals. (which I think is a good name for them)

Watch the video and tell us if you see the same clue and if you agree. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They make it so hard on themselves. I thought of the Washington Reds with the Red Tail Hawk as the mascot last year. They wouldn't have had to change much. Just replace the man with the hawk, get rid of the "kins" in the mascot name.

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They should have just kept it WTF. A team of Generals is very confusing. Does this promote the players to the same level as the coaches now? 

Generals isn't bad compared to a lot of the other options floated.  I honestly thought the WFT name was unique and they should have kept it.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...