Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT to announce new name 2/2/22

Panthers Rhule

By Panthers Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthers Rhule Veteran

Panthers Rhule

Posted
Posted

Washington Football Team to unveil new name and logo Feb. 2 (nfl.com)

Finally, the wait is almost over and we at least know that Football Team will NOT be the new name as well as Wolves nor Redwolves.

They have a hype video which I think offers a clue as to what the new name will be. 

I'm guessing that they will be known as the Washington Generals. (which I think is a good name for them)

Watch the video and tell us if you see the same clue and if you agree. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted (edited)

They make it so hard on themselves. I thought of the Washington Reds with the Red Tail Hawk as the mascot last year. They wouldn't have had to change much. Just replace the man with the hawk, get rid of the "kins" in the mascot name.

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They should have just kept it WTF. A team of Generals is very confusing. Does this promote the players to the same level as the coaches now? 

Generals isn't bad compared to a lot of the other options floated.  I honestly thought the WFT name was unique and they should have kept it.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...