Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT to announce new name 2/2/22


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Generals isn't bad compared to a lot of the other options floated.  I honestly thought the WFT name was unique and they should have kept it.

Aren't the soldiers up in Chicago at their field? Are they going to oversee another team on game day? Isn't there a saying about too many captains on a ship? How about a pack of Generals with no soldiers? 

It's a fitting name for a shi$y organization with a shi$y owner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing is for sure and it's that their fans DO NOT want it to be Commanders.  

Surely Snyder won't pull a Bob Johnson right? Wouldn't put it past him.

Being GroudHOG day, could we be looking at the RedHogs? Oh man I'd strangely love that.

Defenders or Armada may be it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Someone tweeted a day or two ago before this announcement even came out that it was going to be Washington Commanders...let me see if I can find that tweet.

Edit: tweeted out Sat AM

 

But in the video, the show stars on the uniform. Generals wear stars. If it's not Generals the maybe they could get away with Defenders but because of the stars on the uniform I'm still calling Generals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...