Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This off-season will be the most pessimistic the fanbase has ever been if Rhule is brought back for a third season.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

who cares? Rhule already gutted the draft and cap and fuged 2022 for this franchise

it really doesn’t matter

what does matter is he be not allowed to do poo with 2023 draft or give out any big contracts - now that happening, I will be livid about

he’s chosen his ‘process’ if he must be back make him stay on track

ive seriously never heard someone’s plan or process is to continually change directions. You’d think anyone can see that’s BS

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's boo time.

Watching the videos of fans chanting to fire Rhule at the NBA game was great. Carolina fans showing out and looking more galvanized that they have since 2015 is the only positive to be found. The wine and cheese crowd will hate all of this, fantastic.

Maybe it's another step towards having a real fanbase that we just have never had here. JR regulated the stadium so hard that booing could get you kicked out by a yellow shirt. Cheer and boo, it's all just feedback and it needs to be heard or we will see the same BS year in and out like we have.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

It's boo time.

Watching the videos of fans chanting to fire Rhule at the NBA game was great. Carolina fans showing out and looking more galvanized that they have since 2015 is the only positive to be found. The wine and cheese crowd will hate all of this, fantastic.

Maybe it's another step towards having a real fanbase that we just have never had here. JR regulated the stadium so hard that booing could get you kicked out by a yellow shirt. Cheer and boo, it's all just feedback and it needs to be heard or we will see the same BS year in and out like we have.

In Philly or Oakland (back in the day) the security guards wouldn’t even try to remove a booing fan because they’d get their asses kicked. The yellow shirt guys aren’t trying to get a black eye to remove someone for booing. Panthers fans might be getting to that level of angry!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

In Philly or Oakland (back in the day) the security guards wouldn’t even try to remove a booing fan because they’d get their asses kicked. The yellow shirt guys aren’t trying to get a black eye to remove someone for booing. Panthers fans might be getting to that level of angry!

I'm not needing to be Philly but that was some BS. The 'you are standing and interrupting the other fans' is still here for sure. It's a freaking boo and chant, how is that much different than a wave or cheering?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team, under Rhule's direction and Tepper's ownership, has become a dog poo smeared tennis shoe. 

No one wants to wear it.

No one thinks the ones who did it can possibly clean it up.

No one wants to admit it, but it might be time to just chuck the shoe and get some new ones.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more worried about the personnel side of things than anything, though 2022 will also be another lost season if he's the coach. If we bring Rhule back I'm worried that we give Reddick a 18-20m a year megadeal and then have no money to sign anyone else with (generally 10m or so goes to the draft, and we have 28m). Our future gets grimmer every day he remains employed. We still have money clearing next offseason so its not completely unsalvageable and if we act now we won't have to start over again, but I don't know if I have faith in Tepper to act.

We could've gave that Robby contract to Stephon Gilmore (maybe a bit more on the money side of things) if we had simply been patient, but we just had to pre-emptively extend him because he played at Temple.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...