Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams-Carolina Panthers must decide what to do with Brady Christensen. The film is telling


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Matt Rhule will be like….look, he doesn’t have the ceiling to be a Jonathan Ogden.  Therefore I’m going to find a homeless man and give him the LT job.  Deonte Brown is going to do punt returns.  While he impressed you schmucks he will never achieve the elite G play I want.  So I’m going to have Robby Anderson play G.  

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my biggest "oh man how did this happen" situations is that 2 of the more coveted LTs still on the younger/mid career level are Dave Bakhtiari and Dion Dawkins.  Both HEAVILY considered that OG/T mid-round fringe type who eventually excelled because the league has changed a bit defensively and needs flanking each o-line. 

McDermott knew we wanted Dawkins, traded up for him one spot ahead of us in his first draft.  We landed Moton.  Earlier on in our times, Hurney drafted *yack...Edmund Kugzilla and the VERY next pick was Dave Bakhtiari. 

Those are my 2 biggest OL miss outs we've had, I would say even bigger than this whole 2020 Wirfs or 2021 Slater convos.  We ended up with long term potential starters so its not as detrimental as getting fleeced.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But speaking to that both Bak and Dawkins were these OG/Ts that people didn't think would translate to LT.  And they did.  They're also such obvious examples of why many GMs and HCs aren't doing this strict measurables or out standard we apparently hold.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Castavar said:

Stick him at LT. Trade down and draft Linderbaum. Start Deonte Brown. Just like that our line looks competent.

If we'd taken Creed in the 2nd and Trey Smith in the 6th we'd be done already...Who knows if any would have actually got playing time under Rhule though

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

If we'd taken Creed in the 2nd and Trey Smith in the 6th we'd be done already...Who knows if any would have actually got playing time under Rhule though

 

Not to mention Sam Cosmi, Jackson Carman (has been awesome), or Dillon Radunz.  Plenty of OL talent we traded back (hopefully still targeting) and ended with Terrace Marshall & Tremble with our compensation.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

NFL S&C is a lot different than BYU. Well, it is in most NFL organizations. We probably have some jackass from Temple running ours.

Gonna have to disagree with you here.

S&C at major college programs these days is easily at NFL level.  Paying an elite S&C coach and assistants to run your S&C program is a minor budget issue compared to other budgetary aspects of a program.  The expensive part is building an elite S&C facility as well as an accompanying dietary facility and *most* elite programs are willing to do that.  Bama, UGA, Auburn, and BYU (etc.) are paying the money to train their athletes in S&C, I assure you.  Akron, Wyoming, and Buffalo (etc.)?  Probably not.

Now, as always, there are always differences in S&C philosophies.  Some S&C coaches love to concentrate on lower-body (movement, quickness) for OL players.  Others prefer upper-body (arms, reach, push-back).  It all depends on the philosophy of the HC who hires them.

But, trust me, elite college programs provide their athletes with elite S&C.

The only thing limiting them is the time they are allowed to directly train.  NCAA rules limit the amount of direct coaching and training all college athletes receive.  I know there are NFL/NFLPA limits on the amounts of time that athletes at the NFL limit are in "camp" and are "trained", but I can't say for sure if that applies to their time in S&C training though.  If it does, then I gotta say that there probably isn't a helluva lot of difference between the two.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady is NOT a fuging guard period. He does not have the power in his ass to handle DTs every snap. 
 

He needs to remain at LT or swing tackle off the bench. Let him get used to different stunts and zone blitzes on the edge because that was for sure his biggest problem. The guy could fight pretty good heads up. Not a world beater, but he fought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Brady is NOT a fuging guard period. He does not have the power in his ass to handle DTs every snap. 

I have no idea why some fuggers have the fugged up logic that "Oh, my gosh, he can't play tackle? MAKE HIM A GUARD!"

To play OG at the highest level requires a physical mentality and physicality over and above that which it takes to play OT.  Yeah, OT has its *own* requirements when it comes to mentality and physicality, but those are totally DIFFERENT than those it takes to play OL in the interior.

I laughed for a few year at those who, after their Hurney dreams failed at Greg Little being the newest bestest OT for the Carolina Panthers, decided that they could cover for their idiocy by begging that Greg Little play OG.

LOL!

Greg Little was NEVER of a mental state for the physicality of OG.  And its very likely a fact (for differing reasons) that BC isn't either.

He's an OT... or he's fugging not.

STOP pretending that the Rhule thinking that OL are swappable in whatever positions is true.

ITS NOT.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, davos said:

Not to mention Sam Cosmi, Jackson Carman (has been awesome), or Dillon Radunz.  Plenty of OL talent we traded back (hopefully still targeting) and ended with Terrace Marshall & Tremble with our compensation.

My favorite lineman from last draft.  Creed, Carman, and Trey.   Trey at left guard, Creed in middle  and Carman at right and we would fielded a young improved oline.  Cam Erving would still be a weak link but upgrading him this draft would be a option. Instead we need an entire oline basically.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not certain I trust Neal at LT. I think I might take Cross and/or the NCSU kid over him. But honestly I haven't watched a ton of any if them. We've needed a LT for the majority of the past 12 years but until we get a QB and a HC, not much is going to excite me. Put prime Jonathan Ogden on the field next year with Darnold at QB and Rhule and whatever scrub he puts at OC on the sidelines and we're still picking top 5.

I would take Neal or Ekwonu. The thing about Ekwonu is he’s built like and quick enough to be an elite LT. But he has the mean streak of an OG. 
 

So…you literally could put him or Christensen at Tackle and be fine. If Christensen comes back to camp and looks like he can be a pro bowl left tackle then it’s not like you’ll waste Neal or Ekwonu. Either of those guys is going to the pro bowl as a guard and we’ve got our Quenton Nelson setting the stage for a 2000 yard rushing offense. As long as you don’t pass on those guys when they’re there then you will win the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

NFL S&C is a lot different than BYU. Well, it is in most NFL organizations. We probably have some jackass from Temple running ours.

I realize this statement was made to be one part true and then one part funny but you are so damn correct and I would not doubt if some Temple guy is in charge of our S&C. God this is sad and scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

We aren’t winning anything next year. We don’t need an “immediate starter” but honestly half of them would be playing better than Sam by the end if they year. 

That is saying a whole lot though as I feel like we could add most NFL teams second option at QB to start for us and they would be playing better than Sam by the first game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...