Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go Get Watson

USDepartmentOfSavagery
 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Our defense isn't really that good.

Throw in that we'd likely have to give up one or more of our better defensive players as part of the trade.

They are a billion times better than that 2020 Texans defense. Just remember a lot of these defensive pieces are in there 1st 2nd or 3rd year. Room to grow more. And the last part you don’t know yet. But I’d be ok with packaging burns as long as we resign reddick. If we don’t package burns then don’t resign reddick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OceanPanther Mentor

OceanPanther

Posted
Posted

There are so few QB's  in the league, like we saw over the weekend. 6 of them are franchise QB's.

Green Bay

Tampa Bay

Buffalo

Kansas City

Cincinnati 

L A

S F and Tenn QB's are  good, but not next level.

THEY ARE SO FEW,, That when one of them becomes available via the draft or trade, you have to try to get him,  then build the missing parts ( O LINE , etc ) .

No, you don't go after a Tannyhill and not work on the O line first,  But a franchise QB , they are rare, and you have to have one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

They are a billion times better than that 2020 Texans defense. 

Not real sure I buy that.

Phil Snow's schemes got figured out pretty early in the season, and truth be told the adjustments needed to beat It weren't really that difficult.

At this point, any team that can run the ball even half decent can own us pretty easily.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not real sure I buy that.

Phil Snow's schemes got figured out pretty early in the season, and truth be told the adjustments needed to beat It weren't really that difficult.

At this point, any team that can run the ball even half decent can own us pretty easily.

Bet you didn’t watch that Texans defense in 2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TheRumGone said:

I already did. They had the worst defense in the league. Watson kept them in games only losing by 8 points or less except for 4 games. They only got blown out once. He is a total freak show putting up over 5k total yards and 35 tds and he’s not even hit his prime. We however don’t have the worst defense in the league with a very strong core of young talented pieces that plays well with a lead. 

They won the same amount of games without him this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

They are a billion times better than that 2020 Texans defense. Just remember a lot of these defensive pieces are in there 1st 2nd or 3rd year. Room to grow more. And the last part you don’t know yet. But I’d be ok with packaging burns as long as we resign reddick. If we don’t package burns then don’t resign reddick.

Damn Marty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • TD alt
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...