Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule to Auburn?

Carolina Cajun

By Carolina Cajun,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 

Question:  If you are so certain about Rhule not going anywhere, why click on the thread instead of ignoring it? 

To be fair, this isn't the first and only thread bitching about Rhule.   

Its. On. Every. Thread....

...regardless of how the threads are titled.  Not sure where any poster can go on any topic that doesn't bitch about Rhule.

 

"bringing back Taylor is a monumental mistake. It just wastes another year for Burrow."  Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake (thebengalsboard.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Because we have to hang onto every sliver of hope. It's all we have man. Otherwise it's going to be a very long depressing offseason before a long depressing season.

I agree just getting on the people who decide that a thread is not worthy because it conflicts with their opinion, so they enter the thread and mock those who are contributing.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Grand Master

Carolina Cajun

Posted
  • Author
Posted
30 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I agree just getting on the people who decide that a thread is not worthy because it conflicts with their opinion, so they enter the thread and mock those who are contributing.

and honestly, what else panthers related is there to even discuss right now?  Its the offseason, but its still like a full month away from even realistically talking about real draft possibilities.  This is the deadest of the dead periods for teams like us who are irrelevant, and considering the name is brought up by someone else around the auburn program, might as well mention because its not like we have anything else to talk or speculate about.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...