Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremiah: Panthers "dead set" on drafting an offensive lineman


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

This is the debate around Tyler Linderbaum. Checks off every box but do you want to use a #6 on a center? That's higher than Luke and Christian were picked. Kalil was the top C of his class and we got him at the bottom of the second.

Was he worth a first round? Considering how good he was and how long he played, was he worth a first round pick?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

I'm not Mr Scot, but I wouldn't say most were upset about passing on Slater last year. A lot of folks wanted Fields. A lot of the "experts" had Slater as the 1B OT in that draft. He wouldn't have been a reach at all.

As for Horn over Slater? I thought it was an ok pick since corner has been a need for quite a while. I also said I would have taken Slater over Horn since tackles impact every offensive snap whereas corners do not impact every defensive one.

Either way. Horn, while ultimately isn't whom I wanted, wasn't  my first two choices either.  And several teams also felt it was to early for slater, not that I would have minded slater. 

This board was,,  WTF.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MechaZain said:

This is the debate around Tyler Linderbaum. Checks off every box but do you want to use a #6 on a center? That's higher than Luke and Christian were picked. Kalil was the top C of his class and we got him at the bottom of the second.

Better a one-round reach for a centerpiece for the franchise vs a round/pick appropriate bust. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Was he worth a first round? Considering how good he was and how long he played, was he worth a first round pick?

Yes. I don't treat positional value as gospel.  BPA is a myth as well since you won't really know who that was was until the class hits the field.

There's a lot of unspoken value in having a positon sured up, no matter how important it is overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like Linderbaum is akin to Quenton Nelson, a surefire, best prospect in years at a less valuable OL position. Interestingly, Nelson was also drafted at pick 6. No one really questions that selection now. Granted, Nelson had to become a perennial 1st team all pro to really make it worth it and he has. That's a high bar. I'd be ok with Linderbaum; he'd be ultra safe and undoubtedly make our team and offensive line better. But if an OT worthy of a top 10 pick is there, I think you have to take him. The positional value and scarcity of LTs is just too much. The salary allotted to the 6th pick is comparable to a top 10 C but amounts to maybe half of what it costs to sign a top 10 LT; plus free agent centers worthy of signing come around far more often than LTs. 

In a perfect world, if you're taking Linderbaum, you trade down a few spots, draft him and get a sorely needed 3rd. But a lot would have to align perfectly for that: a willing trade partner presenting a good offer and the gamble that he's still available at that slot. And would also have to hope Christensen is equipped to handle LT in that scenario. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised the hype around Green isn't as high a Linderbaum.  He has the size along with the athletic+power combo.  Is if not more tough as nails than the Iowa kid.  Can play tackle and guard (likely long-term guard starter).

Kenyon Green could the the "reach" pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Remember Bradbury the C from NC State who was picked middle of the 1st? He was lauded but McCoy and Jenkins were just a hair behind him in ranking (and played better in the NFL), but they went almost a whole round later. That’s why I’m not a big Linderbaum guy. There seem to be C/Gs who are just a shade better than other C/Gs and they go way earlier than the 2nd/3rd rated guys. The value is usually the 2nd/3rd guys. That’s why I am all in on LT this year and would rather get our future C in day 2 next year when we actually have a day 2 pick or at least have it now. 

True. 

A separate point though is I’m seeing Green ranked right alongside or even higher than Tyler L in a handful of cases.

Anywhere from 8-20ish on big boards.

He’s an interesting one who should be discussed more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do we always let our good players go ?   CMC was injured and we let him go . Now we face him Monday night .  We know what Chuba can do . We know what Rico can do .  We signed Chuba so why not sign Rico .   we don't know what we have in Brooks ,  Let him and Eteine go at it in camp . Keep the better player .  Don't let your proven players leave .
    • Oh, I get it. I called him Peewee for the first couple of years. He is too small to be an NFL QB. It wasn't as much of a problem in college, even in the SEC, because every player in the NFL is the size and speed of the biggest 22 on your entire college team.  I was left scratching my head over the pick and what we traded to get him (and yes, that cost analysis is unavoidable). Now we're sunk into the third season and the kid just popped a frikkin' amazing game out there where he showed every mark of what you need in a top end QB. Great passing, mobility, guts, toughness (that ankle must have been killing him) and the ability to put a team on his back to claw back a win. He didn't win it with his arm so much as by getting the ball to the right people at the right time, but that is what the best do. Do I believe he's going to be our QB of the future here? I'm still out on that. Way out on that. But I'm at least intrigued. Can he replicate what he did or even get close? Can he perform well against the power opponents we have left on the schedule? Heck, can he even beat New Orleans this season?  Right now, my personal feeling is that he'd make a heck of a back-up QB. He could prove me wrong and excel, though. Maddening as it is, that'd be the best outcome ever. Or he could have just hit his peak. And that would be bittersweet because then we start the whole thing over again. I don't see a reclaimation project QB out there right now that Canales can work his magic on.
×
×
  • Create New...