Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Read this, give me your thoughts.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ok? I think the concern is more trying to force sex to someone who isn’t expecting it and not willing to do it. If he paid for it and both parties were ok with it from the beginning than yeah I don’t most people having a problem with that. 

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

I get that. OJ was innocent in the court of law, Big Ben was never found guilty, nor was Ray Lewis. Watson’s case is a “he said, she said” case. You can’t convict people on those. There is still a civil case and that’s a lot of women for it to be a set up. There are text messages of him apologizing to one of them, so there is some smoke there as well. Maybe he thought he was paying for something else? Maybe not? It was enough of an issue for him not to get traded or play last year and still might get suspended multiple games for conduct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

Exactly, people need to stop saying he's guilty.  They couldn't indict him on these charges now the only thing left is civilly. 

I believe the civil suits are going to be settled.   Those women are going to have their lives turned inside and out.  Once they find, they have a very resourceful investigation team, one former customer that had sex with them their suit goes into the toilet.  

IMO they'll take the money offered and move on. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Seems like a lawyer doing their job (assuming this is from the defense). Casting doubt on the motives of the whole by highlighting a few.

Overall, there's probably a mix of $$$ chasers and actual victims, but they get lumped in together.

 

Actual victims, even one, would have been enough evidence to force a criminal trial. 

IMO....More Money Grabbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I get that. OJ was innocent in the court of law, Big Ben was never found guilty, nor was Ray Lewis. Watson’s case is a “he said, she said” case. You can’t convict people on those. There is still a civil case and that’s a lot of women for it to be a set up. There are text messages of him apologizing to one of them, so there is some smoke there as well. Maybe he thought he was paying for something else? Maybe not? It was enough of an issue for him not to get traded or play last year and still might get suspended multiple games for conduct. 

You are making an awful lot of assumptions. Especially with your first post saying he forced himself onto people that didn't want that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Mike in Raleigh said:

If he hadn't been a damn perv, forcing himself on women, there wouldn't be anything for them to go after him for. Just because some saw an opportunity to cash in doesn't excuse his behavior. 

IF it was consensual would you have a problem with it? Because it probably was. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lumbeecheraw75
      New Processing Blue podcast episode

      By lumbeecheraw75 · Posted

      Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • LinvilleGorge
      New Processing Blue podcast episode

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • ClawOn
      Tonight's Game

      By ClawOn · Posted

      Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...