Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Indy would be almost perfect for Watson. But horrible for Texans. 
 

Anyone else interested would be severely hampering their ability to surround him with a decent roster by giving up so much to acquire him. Philly maybe and even that’s a stretch. 

Yeah the colts would be solid but  like you said they are in the division..

Philly would be okay as well imo...

But Seattle,  would be close to us in damage..

The Saints cap situation is fuged already and they would have to cut older still productive players and give up young talent which would crush them..

Tampa have late round picks and a older roster.. They would probably have to give up Evan's, White, and their young safety plus cut ppl to fit his contract on the roster..

Minnesota got to find a trade  partner for Cousin and give up picks..

Who else is in this bidding war..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

The problem is still the guy doing the rebuilding is 70 years old.. How long do you think he is actually going to be there..

This is a good question.

Pete Carroll had every opportunity to retire this year and chose to stay for a rebuild.

I doubt he took that decision lightly as it is no small task.

However, let's say he decides to retire in the next few years.  That is still plenty of time to build a solid foundation for the future.  

Honestly, even if Pete Carroll left tomorrow, Seattle's management still has a long history of making good decisions when it hires head coaches.  I don't see them pulling a Tepper and hiring an NFL novice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

We don't have a crystal ball so, yeah anything could happen.

Best we can do is look at these two organizations and judge them by their performance to date.

In the last ten years:

Seattle has the third winningest record in the NFL.  Only the Patriots and KC have better records.

Carolina is the 16th best, not terrible.  Until you consider that the team's last winning season was 5 years ago.  The sad truth is, the ownership/management responsible for Carolina's worst years this decade are those in charge at the moment.

https://eatdrinkandsleepfootball.com/nfl/most-wins-past-decade.html

If D. Watson has to choose between these two organizations, it shouldn't be tough to decide.  One organization has produced numerous winning seasons, the other has not.

Yeah, Pete Carroll could retire at some point (he is a young 70) but Seattle has done a good job selecting coaches over the decades and I don't see them pulling a Tepper and hiring a novice like Rhule. 

The wild card in all this is Deshaun's desire for control over management/coaching decisions.  If that is his priority, chances are he chooses Carolina.  Russell Wilson also wanted more input into management and coaching decisions in Seattle, he is now in Denver. 

All that success is with players who aren't there any more.. Its a way harder division.. And the coach is 70.. 

And again if we have to give up young talent so will they.. Who do they have that can match our package..

I understand your acknowledgement of how good Seattle has been but this is not the same team and would be just as bad as us after trading for Watson..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncguy2184 said:

When do you guys expect us to hear something as in Watson signing with us or a different team? 

I think he gets traded this coming week. Whether it's early in the week or later I have no idea but I think this is going to come to a head this week. The Texans, Watson, and interested teams all have to be tired of this dragging out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

This is a good question.

Pete Carroll had every opportunity to retire this year and chose to stay for a rebuild.

I doubt he took that decision lightly as it is no small task.

However, let's say he decides to retire in the next few years.  That is still plenty of time to build a solid foundation for the future.  

Honestly, even if Pete Carroll left tomorrow, Seattle's management still has a long history of making good decisions when it hires head coaches.  I don't see them pulling a Tepper and hiring an NFL novice. 

You do know we have some of that Seattle staff (that you are propping up) here now..

Fitt and Morgan were big pieces in that organization..

And again I asked you if they are so good where is the young talent they can put into a package for Watson.. Other then Metcalf and maybe Fant??

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

1. Panthers trade Darnold

2. Another team trades for Darnold

That's how it happens. 

No team other than the moronic Panthers would trade for Darnold last year. Why would teams trade for him now that he has proven it wasn't just the Jets making him look bad?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...