Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

Well, but you said that it would cost "many more premium picks" to trade for Watson than it would to move up. You agree now that's not accurate, right? 

Of course not.  Stop.  Moving up to #1 from like 5 doesn’t cost 3 first, 2 2nds and Burns and Chinn.  Wake up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

New Orleans is a totally wide open, do whatever you want city.  I don't think the people there would care about a player paying hoes for some action.   So there likely wouldn't be any public outcry if Watson joined the team.  

Best place for him then. And they get his huge contract and give up all sorts of draft and player assets to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Saints are said to want draft picks and young talent on rookie deals. If Watson drops the NTC for Panthers and Saints then he will be a Panther, because NO cannot match our trade offer

What if HE wants to play for the Saints over us. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They have a top defense that kept them in games without Brees. They have one of the better offensive lines with weapons in MT, Kamara. They were 9-8 with Semien (spell check) playing QB and were a constant playoff team before the QB injuries last year. Throw a talent like Watson on a constant playoff team with a top OL and you have a good shot. We are shopping every player not named Moton or Burns. That tells me we are still in the beginning of a rebuild (which is fine, but you don’t trade away a bunch of assets for the “final piece” when you gave several holes still).

Say Watson adds 3/4 wins by himself. That makes them 12-5 or 13-4. We go from what 5-12 to 8-9 or 9-8. 
 

To answer your question, I doubt they trade star players (maybe MT). It would be Watson’s decision to go to a contender vs bottom tier team that would make the difference. Only team dumb enough to offer the next 2-3 drafts plus 2 star players is probably us…

The saints would have to trade away players from that defense to make the deal happen, also they would need to cut roby and jenkins. They have to replace 2 olineman starts from last year, and MT will not be in the deal to the Texans, bc the Texans dont want that expensive headache.

I dont think Watson would be coming to last year's saints team. He would be joining a gutted Saints team, with zero space next year as of this moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yeah brother if you think this is a good roster now, and if we give away all that capital we can still recover from it then we are going to have to agree to disagree.  This roster is a poo show with a ton of  holes and no depth anywhere.

We definitely disagree. This team has plenty of talent, it's just lacking at the most important position, QB. And had a total blackhole at QB last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my concern about the Saints geting involved, this is what the Dolphins offered midpoint of the year:

According to Glazer, the Fins were willing to offer up three first-round picks and two second-round selections to Houston for Watson. All of this was contingent on Watson settling the aforementioned cases, which never happened.

If thats what it took, and we are offering players now... does that mean Texans are still open to just draft picks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

If the saints are able to make the money work, i will officially give up on the salary cap.  They are currently sitting at negative 7 million in cap

 

59 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

they still need to clear 41mil total to be able to land watson

Ian says Saints can fit Watson under the cap .

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

The saints would have to trade away players from that defense to make the deal happen, also they would need to cut roby and jenkins. They have to replace 2 olineman starts from last year, and MT will not be in the deal to the Texans, bc the Texans dont want that expensive headache.

I dont think Watson would be coming to last year's saints team. He would be joining a gutted Saints team, with zero space next year as of this moment. 

Restructure, resign, extend whatever BS moves they need to do to make it work for the salary cap. The Saints have been doing it for a decade now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlitzMonster said:

That's where I am too.  If this deal goes down I will find another team to follow.  

I lol'ed at people that thought JR was WAY too involved in football operations and thought Tepper, being a hedge fund guy, would just sit back and let the staff do it's job.   Tepper has quickly achieved Daniel Snyder and Jerry Jones status.  I wasn't a huge fan of the guy in the first place, but now him and Rhule are equals in the loathed department for me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it's that there are a lot of us who think we're winning in spite of Bryce and that he is not, and can not, succeed at a high level in this league.  The reason we're becoming more vocal the last month or so is because we see the writing on the wall, and that the team's success in spite of him is going to get his 5th year extension picked up and brought as our starter despite his actual play not being worthy of either. But I KNOW there are many Panthers fans who want to see Bryce succeed so badly that they are completely blind to the glaringly obvious issues he has and have wet dreams over mediocre games. I'm sorry, but I'm just so sick of people making comments like this. It's so asinine to think the anti Bryce crowd is willing to spend as much time as they do watching the games, following the team, talking on here or other places online, spend our money on team gear, etc, but because we don't think a player is good enough to be our long term QB and give specific and legitimate reasons why, that we want to see the Panthers tank. It's just such nonsense I will fully give him credit that he's improved in certain areas, particularly turnovers.  But small improvements in some areas don't make up for his severe limitations and issues in other critical aspects.   Saying these things doesn't mean we want the Panthers to fail, it just means we have objective opinions and aren't afraid to voice them, even if unpopular with a segment of our fan base.
    • On a side note the goal posts are moving.  At one point this year we were looking at that Arizona game's last drive and wanting him to show us he can finish when a team is no longer in prevent and when he didn't people were claiming he was unable to.  Then he does it against Miami, Dallas, GB, ATL, and LAR and that conversation shifts to his team carried him and GWDs are dumb.   Next we have the YPA and can't throw deep.  Now the YPA is creeping close to some other players like Baker, it's higher than Nix (I'll acknowledge it's still on the lower side) but it shifts to "oh it's all because of YAC" (like none of the other QBs get YAC), and my personal favorite "if you take away his 3 deep passes (he only threw the ball 20 times with a YPA over 10), his passes were all short."  I hope people realize most screen plays are called by the coach and not a QB checking out of some risky deep pass.  If we dialed up several screens (and they worked) that's more of a DC thing that a QB thing.  If they work you screen all day long.  The Rams did it a lot against us too.   He played a good game last Sunday.  He played a bad game the Sunday before.  To me he has shown he CAN play at a high level, but he needs to show consistency.  I also realize we gave up a ton to draft him and the expectations are very high, but at this point those are all sunk costs.  He just needs to show he can be a franchise QB.  
    • I am not sure I know how to figure out how that applies to drops.   And the point was probably supposed to be that players don’t seem to be critiqued even handedly.  And definitely not a criticism against McMillan, I think he is doing a fine job for a rookie in the offensive ecosystem he finds himself in.   I do see the flaws with Legette, some people just have it in for him and won’t cut him any slack whatsoever. I pointed out the drop numbers to illustrate a telling statistic. That apparently it’s okay with people for Tet to drop balls but not Legette the problem child. That’s all.    Players we hate. With me it was Zavala year one, I just wanted him gone. I was pretty disappointed in Wallace year one. I haven’t come to love Zavala but have eased up on Wallace.  Bryce I definitely never wanted. I seem to be easing up on him every other week. Which is better than he used to do but still not up to the consistency standards expected.    slack 
×
×
  • Create New...