Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, ellis said:

Any number of people, but not Gantt —I only bother him for radio hits and Bojangles takes. 

But once again, thanks for taking an unusual interest in the granular details of my work. I hope you’re getting everything you need from me on this, in terms of fulfillment. Talk to you again in a few days, I guess.

Don't quit your day job 👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

This is the equivalent of people being like “I’m gonna vote for Biden! But I’m not gonna like it!” Nobody cares dude you can just leave without saying anything.

I really could not give less a poo about what you or anyone else thinks. It's a Panthers forum, about the Panthers, for Panthers fans, so yeah I'm gonna throw my two cents out as a longtime and loyal fan. You can deal, or if you *really dont care that much* just ignore the post 🙂

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I've been saying, replace one of those marquee names with an extra high pick.  I'd throw them an additional 2nd for Burns and Chinn each, if that's what it takes.  We have two proven commodities in them, so we need to keep them if at all possible.

I'd even be more comfortable with giving up Jaycee.  I think he's a phenomenal player, but the foot injury scares me a bit and he still is fairly unproven as he only played in 3 games as a rookie.

But anyway, 

I'm thinking 3 1sts, 3 2nds, and a 3rd, plus Brown. CMC, Darnold.  It also needs to be considered, this is a #6 overall pick in the 1st this year.  That's crazy value alone.

We no have 2022 second rounder but damn I hope it isn’t quite that much

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Coheed said:

I really could not give less a poo about what you or anyone else thinks. It's a Panthers forum, about the Panthers, for Panthers fans, so yeah I'm gonna throw my two cents out as a longtime and loyal fan. You can deal, or if you *really dont care that much* just ignore the post 🙂

You’re literally just posting this to try to guilt trip people about watching entertainment. I leave morality to higher stakes then football. You’re posting this for a reason.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Coheed said:

I want the team to win, but not enough to cheer for a serial sexual assaulter (or at the very least, someone I can't in good confidence say ISN'T a serial SA). I've been a lurker/member of this board for 15 years, and have watched *every* minute of every game since I was a fan, every draft pick, every practice recap, etc. I'm about as hardcore of a Panthers fan as they come, and I'll be far from the only one to walk from the team if we trade for Watson.  

So the lengthy list of other abuses by NFL players never made you second guess your following of this sports league?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

He probably will get suspended for 6 or so games next year but this isn’t about just next year.

I agree.  So we pay $35m for a QB who is out for over 1/3 of our games.  2022 done, imo. We lose a star RB, DE, and maybe a WR like Moore.  We lose our first in 2022, 2023, and 2024.  And we can only be good when this investment is 28--which means we have a top QB for about 5-7 years.

So if 2022 is a lost cause because we only get Watson for about 60% of the games if he is healthy, why not trade the players you intend to include in the deal for first rounders, basically guaranteeing the chance to draft a top rookie QB in 2023, when the shopping is good? 

Not suggesting this, but I am saying there are many ways to become relevant.  If we dont get Watson, I am OK with it.  If we do, great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

So the lengthy list of other abuses by NFL players never made you second guess your following of this sports league?

A fan of the team doesn't make me a fan of the league. Keep working on those mental gymnastics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I know.  So it will have to be in one of the following years.  Tack it on.

There is a limit on how far out you can trade picks I believe, for what it's worth. I don't think we can trade picks from the 2025 draft or later right now. So we have 3 firsts and 2 seconds potentially on the table. That alone won't get it done most likely, especially if they're taking Darnold's contract off our hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I agree.  So we pay $35m for a QB who is out for over 1/3 of our games.  2022 done, imo. We lose a star RB, DE, and maybe a WR like Moore.  We lose our first in 2022, 2023, and 2024.  And we can only be good when this investment is 28--which means we have a top QB for about 5-7 years.

So if 2022 is a lost cause because we only get Watson for about 60% of the games if he is healthy, why not trade the players you intend to include in the deal for first rounders, basically guaranteeing the chance to draft a top rookie QB in 2023, when the shopping is good? 

Not suggesting this, but I am saying there are many ways to become relevant.  If we dont get Watson, I am OK with it.  If we do, great.

So if it goes down like that, does Matt Rhule get a pass because the team was gutted, and we didn't have Deshaun for almost half the season?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can tell you've done your research on him from this post, as I had part of it in that response at first but removed it as for whatever reason I just felt my explanation of what I was trying to say felt clunky and wasn't getting my point across. It's the varying his speeds during routes part. I actually think that's why he had so many people saying he didn't seem like he had urgency in his route running, because he does THAT so well, and I think sometimes people see it and think he's loafing it out there but he's really just playing mind games with the DB's a lot of the time. He was soooooo good at those "I'm going to fake only running a 5-7 yard slant to sit in the hole but half as second before I know the QB is going to throw me the ball I'm going to take off at full speed" type of routes. We loved running those with him, he'd just run a slow short slant while the action is to the other side of the field through a play action or first read to the opposite side, and then he'd just take off on just enough of an angle to give him space on the defender and catch the pass in stride so he never slows down and gets those long strides moving. And yes, he's great at improvising.  Part of it is that him and our QB have played together since the 8th grade, but it's also something Bryce excels at so I think the two of them will build chemistry on those fast.
    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
×
×
  • Create New...