Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson Watch Day 4 - The Finale


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Tbe said:


I have not. No doubt he wants these QBs, but don’t we all?

Giving his staff the green light to be aggressive is different than forcing decisions on them.

Is he forcing them to do things they don’t want to do or not? That’s the ‘source’ I’m asking for.

Heavy rumors that Tepper pushing hard for QB is why we are mentioned with every QB on the planet including the Teddy and Sam debacle.

 

But maybe they are wrong.   I would give Tep benefit of the doubt but his decision making has been extremely flawed with the Hurney decision and now Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, unicar15 said:

I would argue that NO has a similar roster to ours, a worse cap situation, and a completely unproven coach. Very very realistic that Dennis Allen causes them to take a step back from last year. Sean Payton is probably one of the best 2-3 coaches of the last 25 years. 

Exactly - we saw how NO performed last year when Payton couldn't be on the sidelines.  Heck NO made us look like a super bowl team.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

That’s gonna happen anywhere. We got a fugton of Clemson fans in NC/SC. I get what you’re saying tho. Just trying to keep the dream alive!

I agree with this. 

He brought National Championships (in football) to the Carolinas. There are folk in those parts that would follow him like the next coming...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Boy wouldn’t that be something if Tepper paid off all the young therapists Whip-It-Out abused 🤦‍♂️

 

 

36A7972F-1C59-4D6B-8F96-5FC1A5B3E5A8.jpeg

After labeling as opportunists and attacking the family of the child Britt Reid nearly killed in a drunken crash you are worried about abuse now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watson to New Orleans.

 

The Saints have restructured the contracts of QB Taysom Hill, CB Bradley Roby, LB DeMario Davis and S Malcolm Jenkins to clear major cap space, per source. The Saints are now officially at $29.9M in cap space 👀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jamos14 said:

Watson to New Orleans.

 

The Saints have restructured the contracts of QB Taysom Hill, CB Bradley Roby, LB DeMario Davis and S Malcolm Jenkins to clear major cap space, per source. The Saints are now officially at $29.9M in cap space 👀

Those eyes are uncomfortably large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...