Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per sources, the #Panthers have had conversations with Cam Newton regarding a return


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam absolutely deserves a shot to prove he can still play. He came of his couch last year to play behind a JV offensive line and work with two trash OC's and was still our most exciting offensive player. Give him a full offseason and see what he can do. You can then trade down or take a LT at 6 and continue to build the team. If it doesn't work out then rhule is fired and fitter and a new coach can draft one next year in a better class. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't rank is above Seattle or Indy.

Is it really gonna be a farewell tour though, or are we gonna see one or two good performances followed by three or four that leave everybody saying "yeah, he's done"?

I mean, they probably envisioned last year as a redemption story of some sort but it didn't really work out that way.

Rhule would bench him after he throws his second interception.  Rinse and repeat between Cam and Sam. It will get ugly. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, w280sax said:

Honestly, I think if we can get a stud lt in the draft, I'd be OK with this.  It would be awesome to see cam at his best again surrounded with a solid line and weapons.

I still feel like cam could dominate again if everything went right.

We need a viable backup in about any route we can take now.

Hahaha no. Cam is toast. Can’t pass, runs slow. Move on people. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Rashad from Panther Nation Podcast had inside info that told him we offered Cam a contract but he turned it down 

Did they say he actually turned it down, or just set it aside to return to later? Can't remember but I'm assuming he's not in a rush with all the crazy QB poo going on in the league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

How on earth? they post totally different..

 

 

58 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As others have said, for whatever you think of them individually, those two are nothing alike.

 

25 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Damn man

I think y’all came in at the around the same time and though y’all post different takes y’all post spammy at times. I dunno. I just seriously lump you two as the same poster. Like, my brain just reads your two very different screen names as the same. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...