Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Garoppolo could be flat out cut.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

There are rumors that Lance isn't ready to start. If that's true, SF isn't trading or cutting Jimmy. They'll keep him one more season. 

I dunno about those rumors he flashed a lot in his spot start duty. I get that the 9ers are built to compete for championships now but they’re gonna have to put him out there and let him take his lumps as a rookie qb to learn and grow. Lance was obviously a long term investment but they’re not gonna get it done with Jimmy g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Rhule said:

There are rumors that Lance isn't ready to start. If that's true, SF isn't trading or cutting Jimmy. They'll keep him one more season. 

Shanahan is about to lose that locker room. You spent 3 first round picks on that guy - you can't say he's not ready to start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Shanahan is about to lose that locker room. You spent 3 first round picks on that guy - you can't say he's not ready to start. 

At least, somebody did. I still believe they intended to draft Mac but someone else stepped in last minute because of all the bad press about him not being any good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not against a cheap Jimmy G deal. 1-2 years, whatever. As a bridge QB.

But not with Matt Rhule. We need competent leadership before we can even think about something like that. Otherwise it is just a waste of money and time.

...so..take a chance on his shoulder after surgery...mays well sign Cam.  Hes damaged goods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Won't lose the game for them? Did you miss the last time Jimmy G was on the field?

 

I have a friend that’s a huge 49ers fan. He said if Jimmy didn’t fug his shoulder up against Cowboys they would’ve beat Rams. So he said it was pretty bad which is why he struggled against GB and LA. Idk just thought I would throw that out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

Everyone saying “not interested” must be down with seeing Sam Darnold lose double digit games again, or overdraft a Teddy Bridgewater clone because the coach recruited him out of high school.

Yea we don’t want to sign a guy who has played in the Super Bowl and was in the NFC Championship last year. Nah. Let’s not even consider it. Even if he was a reasonable contract and not giving up any assets to do it. Wow what a horrible idea that would be. I’d much rather have Sam Darnold!!!! Because I like rooting for losers.

Agreed.  For whatever reason you don't like JImmy G.  He's a winner.  If we could get him on a reasonable contract, what is your holdback?  So we draft a rookie, do any of you actually believe that ANY of these rookies are ready to start?

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Agreed.  For whatever reason you don't like JImmy G.  He's a winner.  If we could get him on a reasonable contract, what is your holdback?  So we draft a rookie, do any of you actually believe that ANY of these rookies are ready to start?

 

Hmm 30 year old QB with a banged up shoulder who has underachieved with a loaded roster and one of the best young head coaches. What could go wrong?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Agreed.  For whatever reason you don't like JImmy G.  He's a winner.  If we could get him on a reasonable contract, what is your holdback?  So we draft a rookie, do any of you actually believe that ANY of these rookies are ready to start?

 

He's not a "winner". He's a mediocre QB on a really good overall roster. He's not good enough to provide any lift. If you're a roster that looks like a 5-7 win team without Jimmy G, you're still a 5-7 win team after adding Jimmy G.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been here since middle school right when it started around 2003 after the charlotte.com one. Living outside of Carolina it was tough to find good Panthers content, news or analysis. And no one to talk to about it. This place gave me a lot though I don’t often post. In the later days, I particularly Loved PhillyB’s write ups. They were fire. Too bad I go let it go. I appreciate the hell out of @MHS831 @TheSpecialJuan @Jackie Lee and others who have been posting great content and keeping this place worth coming back to. Particularly during the offseason. Appreciate y’all!
    • Nice explanation, but I was just messing with you. Thought that would be obvious. I dont have the energy to keep on trolling. Last season I compared our situation with Bryce as a potential Alex Smith, but what we should be looking for is our version of Mahomes. Some people will read that as one sentence, to me that single sentence is equivalent to a half A4 explanationf of the teams pathway forward.
    • I dont know how much of his salary would come across and how much a trade would cost but I feel Kmet would be the sort of TE Canales and Morgan would like 
×
×
  • Create New...