Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most teams lose because they don't know why they lost.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Anybody looking at much of any of that speech/rambling and coming away with "this guy knows his poo" doesn't know poo.

I mean he's known about this clinic for a long time, and that's what he prepared? I'd ask for my money back.

It's just like a presser where he just throws stuff out there without ever actually answering or saying anything of value.

Jim Harbaugh made players cry but he made them realize their dream of playing in a Superbowl. Professional football requires a higher level of discipline that this team is missing because of Rhule.

To me he appears very undisciplined next to a guy like Harbaugh in almost every way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams can be biased in their intentions and not look at the results objectively. Also, coaches may be invested in certain players and overlook what may be obvious to outsiders.  And throw in self preservation and healthy dose of hubris when you're making a lot of money and you can easily muck things up and not see obvious problems.  

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Why is that funny? We armchair GMs and Coaches act like if we had OUR way the team would win the SB every season. There's a difference in "not knowing" and being average in terms of talent and expertise.

Because I'm just quoting Matt Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all of the sheer hatred toward Rhule... hatred  so intense that "fans" are rooting for us to lose before we have even started the season.   I wonder what the Huddle will be like if Rhule is kept on board again next year.  

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47aq9bqaqm2wzwljyqqe

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

With all of the sheer hatred toward Rhule... hatred  so intense that "fans" are rooting for us to lose before we have even started the season.   I wonder what the Huddle will be like if Rhule is kept on board again next year.  

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47aq9bqaqm2wzwljyqqe

I'm not impressed by Rhule but it will be funny when all these people walk back their takes and pretend it never happened if Rhule ends up winning, just like they did with Ron Rivera

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, amcoolio said:

I'm not impressed by Rhule but it will be funny when all these people walk back their takes and pretend it never happened if Rhule ends up winning, just like they did with Ron Rivera

I'm not impressed either, but I'm not rooting for the other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...