Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ELLIS L. WILLIAMS Of the OBSERVER on Jimmy G


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think in the trade for a vet QB scenario, I would still go for Baker, he has been mostly good, outside of an injury riddled year last year and could elevate this team. I'd go that route, especially if the browns are forced to eat his salary.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But why?  What purpose does he serve?  The san fran staff is light years ahead of rhule and co and they fully recognize that Jimmy G aint it.  Why would we want to try and win with him?  

 

It makes literally no sense to bring in either baker or jimmy.  Like I dont give a fug how cheap they are trade wise or even if they would play for free.  They are not the answer

Because the staff is trying to win and will have the misconception Jimmy G can. 

So, I agree, but I'm speaking to us having opened the space this year for a move so it would be no thing cap wise.  If that's what they want, I wouldn't have an issue with it. I personally think he's not that good so it would simply prevent maxing out some rollover and we could get a high 2023 for a big swing near the top of the draft.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How is it worth it?  You really think Jimmy G can get this team in the playoffs?   Its imperative we take our lumps with Darnold this year and start completely clean in 2023.

 

Maybe i am the moron here because I am not seeing any value of bringing a hurt (expensive) Jimmy G here on a one year deal.  He would win enough games to fug us in the draft but not enough to want to resign him to a massive starter deal

You're expressing what we'd all want as fans but not the likely reality of the situation.  I've long since accepted they're not sticking with Darnold and trying to save their jobs.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davos said:

You're expressing what we'd all want as fans but not the likely reality of the situation.  I've long since accepted they're not sticking with Darnold and trying to save their jobs.  

This isn't 2010 lame duck John Fox who knows he's on the way out. Rhule is still trying to win in his mind. Now if we do roll with PJ and Sam as QBs that would change my tune but as of not, bottoming out is not an option for Matt.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he won't even be able to throw until August, has no experience in our system and has only succeeded when the offense is tailored to his limitations which is one read only. I can't see how that is any better than what we have in Darnold.  I would go Mayfield. I think his recent fall from grace and little interest in acquiring him should quell much of that ego and douchbaggery behavior.  His comments about wanting to go to a fans cubicle and boo them like he gets on Sunday is likely something all athletes think about when things go poorly. They just don't say it out loud like he did.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If he's released an willing to sign a very low cap hit deal, sure. A trade? No. Not with that cap hit. Not even for a conditional 7th.

Either way, if Jimmy G is our starting QB we're drafting in the top 10 again guaranteed, so why bother at all?

 

The way I see it is any QB trade including Darnold would be fine with me. Any QB trade not including Darnold is unacceptable.

 

I think with an upgraded OL (need to hit on LT in the draft and have our FA guys show they were worth those deals) that a Jimmy G or Baker M could get us into a wildcard slot, IF McAdoo can show he's the real deal as an o coordinator and Rhule shows some progress as a HC. Yes, a lot of big IFs there, but I prefer trying to go that route rather than wasting 6 overall on a likely non-franchise QB.

 

Only if Darnold goes out though, which I hope the Browns come around on as they could use him for the games that Watson is suspended without having to deal with the distraction of Baker. They are in the same position with Baker as us with Darnold, fully guaranteed 5th year option. So releasing him does nothing and clearly no teams want to trade for him. Would make sense for them to just eat the cap hit this year on Darnold and for us to take a chance on a different QB that is no risk since we already have Sam's cap hit anyways. That swap makes sense to me. But no indications that it could realistically happen.

Edited by t96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

The way I see it is any QB trade including Darnold would be fine with me. Any QB trade not including Darnold is unacceptable.

 

I think with an upgraded OL (need to hit on LT in the draft and have our FA guys show they were worth those deals) that a Jimmy G or Baker M could get us into a wildcard slot, IF McAdoo can show he's the real deal as an o coordinator and Rhule shows some progress as a HC. Yes, a lot of big IFs there, but I prefer trying to go that route rather than wasting 6 overall on a likely non-franchise QB.

 

Only if Darnold goes out though, which I hope the Browns come around on as they could use him for the games that Watson is suspended without having to deal with the distraction of Baker. They are in the same position with Baker as us with Darnold, fully guaranteed 5th year option. So releasing him does nothing and clearly no teams want to trade for him. Would make sense for them to just eat the cap hit this year on Darnold and for us to take a chance on a different QB that is no risk since we already have Sam's cap hit anyways. That swap makes sense to me. But no indications that it could realistically happen.

Jimmy G getting us to a wildcard spot with Rhule and company...

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Jimmy G could be a perfect fit for our current status quo if we're looking to spend significant resources on a bad veteran QB on our way to a five win season.

I concur bro!! If we going that route, might as well roll Sam back out and suffer without the resources  being  wasted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Alright.  Say Jimmy G wins the job and has about 9 wins on the season.  Then what?

Then we have our first winning season in about half a decade and I have some hope for the future. And I'd totally be ready to eat crow about not wanting Garoppolo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

I’m honestly curious how many times an nfl team could make the same mistake in a row

It won't be the "same" mistake if we're not giving up draft capital. It's not really even the same with a little draft capital and Darnold's contract. It would be horrific--absurd to trade for him, give up draft capital, and keep Darnold's contract on the books. But we can't realistically afford that so I'm not too worried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I wonder if everyone on this forum realize that landing a top QB in a draft doesnt mean you HAVE to have a losing season the year prior.... every year a team or two trades up to grab a QB. If your roster is good enough, you do it. 

Bills did it.
Chiefs did it.
49ers did it.
Ravens did it.

 

 

Agree.

The best current crop of QBs went into solid foundations that had been built a year (or few years) prior.  Those teams identified the guy they wanted and pursued him with building around him in mind.    

Bills were year 2 with the new regime, having drafted Dion Dawkins (1 pick ahead of Moton), Trevarious White, Matt Milano the year prior.  Had a lot of good parts building up, higher pick in the draft but came after Baker and Darnold lol.

Chiefs had a full Andy Reid team assembled for Mahomes.  Solid foundation, not a top pick.   

Chargers had been growing the D around Bosa and solid weapons in place to let Herbert into.  Didn't have to tank for him.  

Lamar went late 1st to an already good team.

An exception being in CIN where Duke Tobin had taken back the reigns circa Carson Palmer/Ocho/TJ days and was lucky enough to land Burrow after a previous year setup.  People were expecting Taylor to have had a much better 1st season than he did 

--

And zeroing in on the discussion, 49ers went for it all after they had proven to have the rest of the team in order.  That squad has made it to the NFCC game twice without a legit QB (Jimmy G, who's the guy in discussion preventing us from drafting a top QB haha)

Just keep building and find your guy.  It sucks because, well this coaching staff sucks and should have been fired.  But that means I'd rather keep building the foundation for the next regime.  The thing that sucks is that this should have been their first year.  Just don't mortgage any 2023s or pushover anymore 2023 cap.  Those are the two rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
    • Spot-on. D-line and FS are much bigger immediate needs than OT or WR. Look at the current roster and the fact that they have not brought in any new players at those positions. 
×
×
  • Create New...