Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Projected starting offensive line


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

remember that we had a second round grade on Brady as a guard (3rd as tackle) and now he has a year in our strength program.  Moton is proven.

We just need our new free agents to be better, and get a long term start at center and guard in the next two years, and we're set for the future.

We can hope to draft a QB this year by moving up, but remember that next year is a better year for the draft at that position, but we are also suddenly much more appealing to free agents with a good line, CMC and DJ.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fritterer is honestly a frigging genius. INSANELY good upgrades desperately needed on the line in 1 offseason. Bozeman is an above average starting center, Corbett is a top 10 guard and Ekwonu the best LT prospect in quite a few years. Moton holding down the right side. The only potential weak link is the other guard slot but I believe in Brady there.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think they are going to put Bozeman there and try Elf at center.  At any rate, keep BC as the swing tackle...like I've been saying.  He's decent, but decent shouldn't be your starter unless forced into service due to injury.

This. I think Pat is the starting C, BB is LG and Brady is the swing guy. Plus now all of a sudden we’ve got tons of depth with Cam and Daley. We could actually have one of the best lines in the league after years and years of having the worst. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, t96 said:

Fritterer is honestly a frigging genius. INSANELY good upgrades desperately needed on the line in 1 offseason. Bozeman is an above average starting center, Corbett is a top 10 guard and Ekwonu the best LT prospect in quite a few years. Moton holding down the right side. The only potential weak link is the other guard slot but I believe in Brady there.

Yeah everything looks great until you see Darnold's mug looking right back at you.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, joemac said:

This. I think Pat is the starting C, BB is LG and Brady is the swing guy. Plus now all of a sudden we’ve got tons of depth with Cam and Daley. We could actually have one of the best lines in the league after years and years of having the worst. 

Why the hell would they move Bozeman back to guard?? He was a top 5 center last year and Clearly better at that position than guard. That would be such a Rhule move to do that.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
×
×
  • Create New...