Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monday morning thoughts


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Someone else posted this in another thread, but I’m can’t remember where.

Darnold seemed to struggle picking up the playbook in his first year, they had to limit it in his first couple of starts. This is a new playbook so he only has a slight head start. What if Corral picks it up really quick? The other players will notice. Then how can you not start Corral?

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Martin said:

Someone else posted this in another thread, but I’m can’t remember where.

Darnold seemed to struggle picking up the playbook in his first year, they had to limit it in his first couple of starts. This is a new playbook so he only has a slight head start. What if Corral picks it up really quick? The other players will notice. Then how can you not start Corral?

They starting qb will (should) be decided by game 1.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

The problem there is if Sam Dawnold manages to win a few games before getting exposed. Then we have a BC situation all over again with Corral. 

I would say they're going to want to see if the cheap guy can get it done instead of signing Darnold to an extension and having Corral rot his cheap years away on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

Someone else posted this in another thread, but I’m can’t remember where.

Darnold seemed to struggle picking up the playbook in his first year, they had to limit it in his first couple of starts. This is a new playbook so he only has a slight head start. What if Corral picks it up really quick? The other players will notice. Then how can you not start Corral?

Yup, hard to say if it was Darnold or Joe Brady that could only muster up like 6 total plays to choose from. I'd say Corral is definitely more in line with what McAdoo had Eli running with the Giants, quick strikes in stride for YAC. Darnold waits/thinks too long and then tries to compensate by drilling the ball to the guy where we saw all those drops and hospital balls last season. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

It’s going to take a lot for Corral to make an immediate impact. He was in a one-read offense that was pretty basic, at least that’s what I’m told. Wouldn’t be surprised if Sam keeps the #1 status until he starts falling apart.

It wasn't so much one-read. It was more pre snap read or, I'm not sure the term here, but one key reads. Basically a lot of reading one defensive player....if that LB does this, then the ball goes here but if the LB goes the other way the ball goes there. A lot of presnap motion in their plays. Very heavy play action which plays well with the RPO and QB draws that they would run.

The biggest issue I've seen is when the play breaks down and his expected read isn't open, he skips reads and goes straight to the checkdown. There's a lot of is 1 there? 3? ball goes to 4. Or 1, ball goes to 4. He processes too fast and skips guys.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

Someone else posted this in another thread, but I’m can’t remember where.

Darnold seemed to struggle picking up the playbook in his first year, they had to limit it in his first couple of starts. This is a new playbook so he only has a slight head start. What if Corral picks it up really quick? The other players will notice. Then how can you not start Corral?

Ive heard Ben mcadoo playbook is totally different that bradys was. It was form a former WR james Jones if I member right. He played in bens system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Zod said:

1. Considering how few picks they had, the Panthers coupd not have dreamed things went so well for them.

2. Corral is the most exciting Panthers rookie QB since Cam Newton. That much is not really debatable. At the very least it's some interest and excitement to see how he does. 

3. The Panthers have the most complete roster that they have had in probably 4 seasons. If this is not a winning season, Rhule absolutely needs to be canned.

4. I'd like to remind everyone that for a LT to step in and be good right away is very rare. Most struggle for at least a few games if not an entire season. Heck, Jordan Gross started at RT his rookie year for this very reason.

If Sam Delusional starts, this season WON'T be a winning season.

I'm throwing that out there right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have too good of a team to just tank out of the gate with Corral.

We'll see both of these guys start at some point this season.  Darnold will start games 1 and 2.  He will continue to start until he gets hurt or we are 2 games under .500.  If some miracle happens and we start off with a winning record early, the hook will change to a 2-game losing streak.

Bottom line, Sam gives us an outside chance to make the playoffs.  Once that ship has sailed, he gets hurt, or he simply loses focus, we'll look to get some experience for the kid.  My guess, Corral starts game 5.  Then he'll eventually get hurt too and Sam will be back out there.

Hopefully he gets at least 6 starts in order to get a feel for his leadership and developmental skills against NFL competition (command of huddle, reading defenses, minimizing turnovers, etc.).  This will tell us if we need to draft a QB or use the draft to get him some weapons. 

Should be an entertaining season with lots of drama.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup, hard to say if it was Darnold or Joe Brady that could only muster up like 6 total plays to choose from. I'd say Corral is definitely more in line with what McAdoo had Eli running with the Giants, quick strikes in stride for YAC. Darnold waits/thinks too long and then tries to compensate by drilling the ball to the guy where we saw all those drops and hospital balls last season. 

I just wish we had someone more exciting than Robbie next to DJ.  Really home TMJ gets it going this year.  Would hate for another R2 receiver to bust.  He was so good in college, looked great in preseason and then poof.  It's a mystery.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, davos said:

I just wish we had someone more exciting than Robbie next to DJ.  Really home TMJ gets it going this year.  Would hate for another R2 receiver to bust.  He was so good in college, looked great in preseason and then poof.  It's a mystery.

Last I heard Rhule was trying to reteach TMJ his gait, which sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...