Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Jimmy G still be on the table?


FuFuLamePoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

And I want to be very clear I'm in no way endorsing it, I just still have a hard time believing Sam is your week 1 starter. 

They obviously don't want him to be. What are the options? Sam for Baker straight up trade? Jimmy G gets cut and signs for $10M and we just release Sam and eat the money? It's hard finding a way to get Darnold out of the building without eating the money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not he starts any games this year we need to give Corral some playing time. Even if Darnold gets the majority of the snaps we need to see if we feel comfortable moving forward with plans for Corral as a future starting quarterback. We do not need to repeat the Christensen experiment with Corral.  Bringing Jimmy G. On board will complicate that. Besides, we still may need cap space to sign a couple of players on defense. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, tecc86 said:

If the reports about the 49ers not being impressed with Trey Lances development so far I wouldn't be surprised to see them keep Jimmy for another year.

I cant believe people are buying this. 

The only reason these "leaks" are coming out is because they want a 2nd or better for Jimmy G. IF they flat out said Lance was the starter, what little value Jimmy Generic has goes down the drain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

They obviously don't want him to be. What are the options? Sam for Baker straight up trade? Jimmy G gets cut and signs for $10M and we just release Sam and eat the money? It's hard finding a way to get Darnold out of the building without eating the money

I dont see what the problem is, if he plays or not we still have to pay him.

Playing him will be a direct detriment to the team. Eat the 18m and flush the turd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/8/2022 at 11:07 AM, frankw said:

He's not that big of an upgrade and the 49ers were asking for a 2nd round pick last I heard. This idea should be done and over with by now.

That would be hilarious. End up having no 2nd or 3rd round picks for a second straight season.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...