Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have second most cap space in the NFL


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, davos said:

It's good particularly for rollover which I have not seen mentioned.  And also the fact that Burns is the only one needing a substantial pay day (The entire 2019 draft was a bust minus Burns ).  Those looking at 2023-24 need to check back to see where 2022 stood at this point in 2021.  

We're easily going to rollover $20 mil+ and restructure a few contracts.  That alone gets us back to the green before any moves, releases, etc.  Cap is very fluid, which is why I've chosen to not really get too opinionated on the space available at a given time.    

 

If Corral isn't the answer and we can't land a start in next years draft then we have to pay someone to play QB. The top 2023 FA options are..Jimmy G, Baker, Sam and Teddy lol. Followed up by possibly Daniel Jones, Minshew, Case Keenum, Mason Rudolph etc..

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PantherKyle said:

I'm excited for CMC to remind everyone how good he is this year. 

I think everyone knows how good he is. The one thing he's not good at, though, is staying healthy and i think that's what everyone also gets reminded of.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still can't believe we made such a move for Watson and now I can't belive we are letting our cap situation be that bad for next year when we have time to rework those deals to eat it all this year and level it out for next year...

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the cap in 2023 is expected to be between 220 and 225. That is 12 to 17 million over the 2022 cap of 208.  And we can manipulate the cap next year to get where ever we need to be. Sulaiman's job is to fit the players signed by Fitterer to the best contract terms beneficial to the team. He has done that. I guarantee he is already mapping out what he plans to do next year and the year after. I dont worry about the cap and ignore them when they say they can't afford someone when it really means we don't value them enough to pay them what they are worth.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Made some comments on radio about happy endings not technically being illegal.

Basically, he seems to have switched from "he didn't do it" to "well if he did, was it really that bad?" 😕

Regardless of the facts of the case, what an incredibly stupid thing for a lawyer to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Made some comments on radio about happy endings not technically being illegal.

Basically, he seems to have switched from "he didn't do it" to "well if he did, was it really that bad?" 😕

Rusty is as good as ANY lawyer in states, but those recent comments .......my god i thought rule one - "No talking". I get it reaches a point, a boiling point per say which a statement is a must. Go in with the mindless repeat phases on your machine gun mouth...... and dont make the case for the other side, seen that in the depp case as well... feels like the whole world has lost IQ points over the last 5 years, noah get the boat ready..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I hear you man but this is not a litmus test for OUR character. All the sucking it up in the world won’t affect anything about that football team and the issue of a failed draft deal.  The point is would you want to go back to that steakhouse? I mean, no you probably don’t. I don’t have to suck that up. I am free to lobby and critique as it moves me, same as you. I am saying I don’t the team to go back to a crappy steakhouse lol. 
    • Dealing with the now and building a foundation to build a future upon would have been a great sign of change and a serious attempt to turn this thing around. Those guys that were all fired were also pitching the future. Rhule's 7 year plan and last year's platoff team while taking a still weak NFCS were just more of the same. You already answered you own question. 2 win teams don't usually develop projects well, stable and well run teams do. That is not close to the Panthers at this time. The future doesn't matter if it looks like the recent past for them.
    • Honestly I think you are more sensitive to other people’s opinions a little more than I am in the sense that the lack of a tie and the disciplining that resulted didn’t make me think much besides someone was being an asshole. And I don’t care if other people don’t think that; it won’t really change how I view it. They are free to think it. WTF does CMC have to do with it? I am sorry I don’t get it.  And I don’t see people talking about Darnold vs Cam the way you say. I really just think you might be looking and waiting for a chance to be taking some umbrage with stuff that seems to me is really fairly isolated and not reflective of how most of us think. Maybe you think we think that way? No offense really, I am just not seeing what you are seeing. If I say a criticism of a player I promise it is not motivated by some agenda other than football ands winning. Or losing wtf it is the Panthers. If that changes I will for sure preface what I say with my reasons for saying it.  And I know what saying this stuff may lead to in terms of characterization language but I hope it doesn’t.
×
×
  • Create New...