Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams Charlotte Observer: Panthers SHOULD Trade for Mayfield sooner than later


 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, RenoCarolina said:

I wish media, especially local media, would just let this go. I understand browns would love us to rid them of one of their problems but local guys, stop taking the bait  

Would much rather hear about how McAdoo has a chance to turn this offense (and team) around. 
 
 

I doubt that’s happening (the turnaround)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

I don't think the issue is finding it. It's the building of the transportation that will hold us up based on earthly science and materials to this point. There have been thousands of habitable planets found in the milky way alone to this point. Also fug Baker Mayfield. What a mistake that would be. 

Maybe but I doubt we send millions of people there before we check it out in person, so that’s all part of the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Trading picks for a minor improvement is dumb considering he's got one year on his contract. It's pretty simple 

Yeah exactly this. We're not winning a SB with Mayfield. He's either a 1 year temp., or we sign him long term and be average indefinitely. He is an improvement, but not enough of an improvement at this time, unless the goal is to tread water.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would get excited if we traded for Baker and all it cost us is some cap space and a low round pick.

IF we did land him, then you do a wide open training camp competition. Baker vs Darnold. 

 

That said, my preference would be to go all in on Darnold. Sink or swim and save all draft capital for next year's QB. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...