Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vikings Wire writer taking potshots at Panthers


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Cousins is a very very good QB. He is also a QB who will never get his team deep in the playoffs or win a Super Bowl. I believe you have to have a certain personality that can help you connect with offense and defense as well as alpha energy in the huddle to make your entire team better. That’s what gets teams deep in the playoffs and helps them win Super Bowls. Cousins is not the guy who brings the Tom Brady energy to his team which is why he will always be a QB who has great stats, but nothing when it matters most. With all that being said he is clearly a much better QB talent wise than anything we have currently.

This is such a horeshyt take. There have been plenty of Avg Quarterbacks that have won a Bowl. Foles, Dilfer, Flacco just to name a few. If you put Cousins on any of those Ravens teams they are still winning the championship. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

They beat us, they can talk their crap. 

Cousins is SIGNIFICANTLY better than Darnold.

Still wouldn't have wanted to trade for him because it would have been for way too much. 

I'm sure we would have been happy to consider Cousins for $5M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

"Embarrassment of riches in the offense."

A broken down OBJ and a Average Jarvis Landry isn't an embarrassment of riches. lol. Chubb and Hunt are good tho. I'll give him that. This dude talking like he had Kelce, Hill, Watkins, etc.

The offensive line they had was pretty good if not a top unit.  I think that’s the biggest question.  Can we even protect this guy long enough to be average?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

The Browns gave up 3 fewer sacks than Carolina last year. Where is this idea that they had some great line coming from? They were 27th and 28th in that regard.

There seems to be a thing in the nfl that if you’re good at run blocking or pass blocking you’re great all around but that’s not always the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

The Browns gave up 3 fewer sacks than Carolina last year. Where is this idea that they had some great line coming from? They were 27th and 28th in that regard.

Basically really good run blocking. Their tackles were injured most of the year so they had scrubs out there against edge rushers in pass pro. Anyways this Vikings guy can suck it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

I have no doubt they had a much better line than we did. But it wasn't great....and we have a new line so we don't know what we have. Likely a notably improved line.

This sort of goes along with the disclaimer "past performance is no guarantee of future results."

Our OL has almost always been one target of the "we are only one or two pieces away" thinking.  Historically, we bring in new pieces, our expectations go up, and they have generally not panned out.  The exception being 2015 when the group gelled until the Superb Owl.  So, we are jaded on the OL subject. 

I am generally of the "show me first" line of thinking, but I must admit, the fact we actually drafted somebody expected to be a major piece has me hopeful.  Guarded, but hopeful.

Then there is the minor fact that we couldn't be any worse than we were last year.

As far as the Vikings and the QB debate, Cousins is a decent to good QB.  I also think he is widely underrated.....except by whoever negotiated his contract with the Vikings.  On total cash for the year, he is the 5th highest-paid QB in 2022 per Spotrac.  He is above both Brady and Mahomes, and $10M above Brady at that. 

To put it in stock market terms, his P/E ratio has him overvalued.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...