Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR

Floppin

By Floppin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

I still think Howell should have been the pick, but whose bright idea was it to have Corral backed up in his own endzone against a garbage OL, garbage RBs who can’t block, and garbage WRs who will probably struggle to make the PS? Unreal mismanagement 

Would you have wanted Howell's development to be put in the hands of Matt Rhule?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

It doesn't matter, he's just out of college the other two aren't winning a damn thing. Facts.

Even IF the other guys could get a ball into the fade drill hoop they weren't as accurate as Corral that's just one out of many examples of why ANY rookie QB is better than those guys especially in a losing team.

Corral should have been the reset button on this sh*t, instead he got set up to fail. He was the least prepared physically for live fire reps. All the QBs had more snaps. It had nothing to do with anything but Rhule. His mental rep training was world class though courtesy of your HC.

Baker, Sam, PJ wouldn't make most NFL rosters. Be honest with yourselves now it'll be less of a Baker meltdown when it happens. 

 

Dude Corral was my top QB in the draft; I love the tools he has, but if you want to be taken seriously you can’t be hyperbole all the time. 
 

It’s like you started as parody and gaslit yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Evil Hurney Mentor

Evil Hurney

Posted
Posted

Sucks for Corral. It'll be interesting to see if they wait until after the 53 cutdown to put him on the IR (to make him eligible to return late in the season). If the timeline allows, I'd prefer he be able to practice in December and January.

For Rhule, this decreases his odds for a year 4. With a healthy Corral he could more easily survive a losing season if Corral played well late in the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DMathematics said:

they didn't trade up for willis tho... he fell to them something we should have been waiting on 

Yeah we didn't trade 3 1st round picks..

You ppl act like they gave up a Tre Lance trade to get Corral.. Its a future 3rd and a 4th this year.. That's not future killing compensation..

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, rippadonn said:

My original assessment was 7 games. It went down to six.

After another week of Matt Rhule f' ups I'll have us at five wins.

If you're still expecting 7 wins out of a Matt Rhule team.... You haven't been paying attention. 

Dude is a joke. Baker is ordinary, very ordinary. If CMC can't go the whole season, oh boy.

7 games is scrubbville. Why aren't you predicting 10?.....I know why, you're not Fhulish.

I'll bet if you go up to 10 wins. Scared?

 

You are honestly afraid that Rhule will get 9 wins so you set the bar at 10?    After all that?  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Vegas says 6.5   First you predict with certainty that we'll hit 6, now you're afraid that a Rhule led team will exceed Vegas expectations?  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You are honestly afraid that Rhule will get 9 wins so you set the bar at 10?    After all that?  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Vegas says 6.5   First you predict with certainty that we'll hit 6, now you're afraid that a Rhule led team will exceed Vegas expectations?  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

No I had them at 7, went down to six. He was at 7 too so I said in order for it to be a bet and since HE is so confident in Matt Rhule he should go to ten for the bet.

0 confidence in a Rhule lead team. 0.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, poundaway said:

I don't believe you.  If you have 0 confidence in Rhule and you predicted 6 wins, put your avatar where your mouth is. 

You are honestly afraid that a Rhule led team will beat vegas.   🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

It's the same people that hate Baker, claim he is no better than Darnold.  Then they are pissed he will ruin our draft position and save Rhule's job????  

Excuse Me Reaction GIF by Bounce

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...