Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral assessment from Simms


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

massive bust confirmed 

Can’t label him a bust just yet. Kid got dealt a bad hand IMO. In typical Panthers’ fashion, we placed him at a considerable disadvantage with limited reps and subpar supporting cast.

The good news is he gets a redshirt season to learn while rehabbing and, if he makes a full recovery, he has a decent shot at making the roster as top backup (Mayfield works out) or competing for the starting job next season.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

How many non-Cam, non-Lamar QBs can make something happen with two DL in your face one second after the snap, though?

Right. And even they get eaten sometimes. 
 

Corral does have tape easily handling free SEC rushers in space. The thing is, he calmly handles a single free rusher, but people expect him to superman 2-3 guys? Let’s be realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Not sure you’re watching the right player then

His arm is average and he was getting caught from behind by 3rd and 4th string LB/DL. He’s not a bust and might be a decent backup but simms really sold it like he had Rodgers arm. And fans bought it. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RJK said:

His arm is average and he was getting caught from behind by 3rd and 4th string LB/DL. He’s not a bust and might be a decent backup but simms really sold it like he had Rodgers arm. And fans bought it. 

Nah Corral I do believe was the best prospect, but he’s been an after thought at practice and then being thrown into live action. Not really a reliable way to measure a guy’s talent level. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...