Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Buffalo to rest most starters (including Allen) vs Carolina in Preseason finale


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

It was common knowledge in a 4 game preseason.

Yet it's not happening this year.  You simply aren't paying attention. If you were following preseason games you would know this. 

Look at the games. Look who played. The summary of what teams are doing has been mentioned here numerous times. Pay attention to something.....anything. Teams playing starters more than a drive last week were in the minority. 

 

Literally Bufallo. But it's still relatively the same. Only a few teams, like the Panthers, or Jets, are really playing starters in the final preseason game.

Resting the starters - Wikipedia

It's even in the god damn Wiki. There's a good reason for it. LA actually didn't play any starters last preseason, and won the fuging Super Bowl.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

I am going to be there rooting Baker and company to score early and often against the Bills. I don't care who they play. After all without gameplanning this is not game conditions.

Yeah, I don’t care who they play against pending they play.  I’d just like to see them get some reps in to get some timing and chemistry in against guys they don’t know. 

I could still probably do without seeing DJ or CMC though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rippadonn said:

For all that $$$$$$$ he provides little value if you then have to get rid of guys and hire shadow HCs.

Should have gave Jim Harbaugh(.695 NFL win percentage) that $$$$, more even, now having learned not to hire college coaches without NFL HC experience.

...yea...analytics dont mean sht....just a tep buzzword...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Shufdog said:

So you want this place to be like Twitter?

Pretty much every place that has humans interacting with one another via screens looks like this. It's wired in us now. If it bothers someone that much they should throw their smartphone out and shack up in a remote cabin and live off the land.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, frankw said:

Pretty much every place that has humans interacting with one another via screens looks like this. It's wired in us now. If it bothers someone that much they should throw their smartphone out and shack up in a remote cabin and live off the land.

spacer.png

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Because you troll, whine and bitch about everything and are a huge Debbie downer. If that is love I feel for all the people you love so much......

 

Baker, Baker, Baker and your favorite winning NFL franchise the Browns. Hi how you doing. Sounds like you could start a ripp hate thread.

I bet more people hate Rhule than anything I have to say. Plus, your unrealistic love for Baker, Baker, Baker is true bottom feeding.

Good day!

 

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Their backups are probably going to kick our ass so I wouldn't be bitching too much if I were you guys.

Bills got quite the team, one of the few that can already start making SB plans.

fyi Whoever they wavie form their edge group, wouldnt shock me to see panthers make a claim. was some smoke about A.J. Epenesa getting cut(i dont buy it)

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Bills got quite the team, one of the few that can already start making SB plans.

fyi Whoever they wavie form their edge group, wouldnt shock me to see panthers make a claim. was some smoke about A.J. Epenesa getting cut(i dont buy it)

I certainly hope we do. I know Ron will be looking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

Yeah, I don’t care who they play against pending they play.  I’d just like to see them get some reps in to get some timing and chemistry in against guys they don’t know. 

I could still probably do without seeing DJ or CMC though 

DJ will likely play in the first quarter to work on gamestyle chemistry with Baker. CMC won't play at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...