Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign dl Henry anderson


w280sax
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

ESPN:

The Jets made a shrewd trade to acquire Anderson during the 2018 draft, sending a seventh-round pick to the Indianapolis Colts. He flourished in New York, recording a career-high seven sacks in the final year of his rookie contract.

Anderson parlayed his big year into a three-year, $25.2 million contract, with $17 million in guarantees over the first two years. Since the contract, his sack production dropped dramatically -- only 1.5 over the past 29 games. He played every game in 2020, finishing with 42 total tackles.

Anderson recorded the third-highest run-stuff percentage among defensive players with at least 500 snaps, according to NFL NextGen Stats.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mcsmoak said:

True or False, Roy would have been cut over Nixon had Roy not played at Baylor

Hard to say. Nixon had some huge character red flags coming out of college.  Then he had the injury last season to his neck I think.  Those injuries can linger.  Who's to say he was fully healed?  Granted Roy is a JAG, but Nixon had his own issues.  He may land back on the practice squad at some point.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Twitter comments say this guy is good at stopping the run. That's a start, I guess. 

Thanks that’s what I was curious about. Now we at least know there is a clear plan. Cleveland for the last 3 years has been top 3 in rushing. This is a step to ensure Cleveland doesn’t run all over us.  I’m not sure why some of the other Huddlers are surprised based on how Rhule can be quick to the trigger. Nixon wasn’t going to turn into an All-Pro. He fell out of favor in college, so why gamble on a low floor  decent ceiling defensive lineman now. We also need to be honest Nixon didn’t flash this year and Hoskins and McCall are both stout against the run.  I like the signing,  if it works on Sunday. We don’t need any 150 yard rushing days from the Browns. We definitely don’t need Chubb gashing us and taking our defenses confidence away. At least our coaches know their potential flaws. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Hard to say. Nixon had some huge character red flags coming out of college.  Then he had the injury last season to his neck I think.  Those injuries can linger.  Who's to say he was fully healed?  Granted Roy is a JAG, but Nixon had his own issues.  He may land back on the practice squad at some point.

 

5 minutes ago, mcsmoak said:

True or False, Roy would have been cut over Nixon had Roy not played at Baylor

Hard point to argue there. I think this move is more about taking Cleveland’s rushing attack away. Roy is a better run stopper than Nixon. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beast_3000 said:

Thanks that’s what I was curious about. Now we at least know there is a clear plan. Cleveland for the last 3 years has been top 3 in rushing. This is a step to ensure Cleveland doesn’t run all over us.  I’m not sure why some of the other Huddlers are surprised based on how Rhule can be quick to the trigger. Nixon wasn’t going to turn into an All-Pro. He fell out of favor in college, so why gamble on a low floor  decent ceiling defensive lineman now. We also need to be honest Nixon didn’t flash this year and Hoskins and McCall are both stout against the run.  I like the signing,  if it works on Sunday. We don’t need any 150 yard rushing days from the Browns. We definitely don’t need Chubb gashing us and taking our defenses confidence away. At least our coaches know their potential flaws. 

It does seem like an improvement on a weak area. Guess we will see how it works out. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Solid run stopper also supposedly a pretty dirty player. 

The Nixon cut is baffling. That draft class looks weaker and weaker.

Yep, Flecher, Brown and Nixon all cut.  Brown and Nixon were Marty-type players, so that doesn't shock me.  What is a Marty-type player?  One whose pre-draft stock is relatively high at the beginning of the process and steadily drops throughout and come draft day throws out a net to catch said falling prospect thinking they got a 'steal.'

Horn, Christensen and Smith may be the only ones to get another contract out of that class.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I fully expected us to sign a DL. But this particular signing is extremely meh.

Yeah… not a fan of this.  We have some cap space and a better DT would’ve been nicer.  Our depth there is razor thin, so hopefully this isn’t the only signing we make.  We’ll see what happens.  
 

just saw he’s a DE not a DT, I will see what he does before I crap on the guy.  Had 7 sacks not too long ago.  Depth is depth, just please get us some solid DT depth and I’ll be happy 

Edited by PandaMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...