Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL does owe the Panthers an explanation why the Brissett spike was not intentional grounding.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

Yeah, we put ourselves in positions to lose but you have to wonder if the refs have an interest to determine the outcomes. Organized crime, gambling addiction, or maybe the NFL wants the browns in the playoff hunt. 

maybe one is a Panther fan.  Trying to end this debacle. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

That's how people bet on these reality shows and stuff at vegas for whatever dumb reason, 

vegas shouldn't be taking bets on pre-taped reality shows.

Live shows, like Dancing with the Stars (new season premiering next week on Disney+ 😀 ), are a different story of questionable legitimacy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Considering we live in a country where our politicians are openly bribed, I have even less confident our sports leagues are "fair" either.

That's definitely true.  I'm just saying if there was ever a way that it could be proven then the nfl would be in huge trouble legally. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate when refs don't just own up to their mistakes. It would be so easy to say on the Burns roughing call "At our angle, it looked like he made forceable contact to the head or neck area. Of course on replay, we realized we made a mistake. Unfortunately we are human and we regret that mistake happened at such a critical juncture of the game." 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

I hate when refs don't just own up to their mistakes. It would be so easy to say on the Burns roughing call "At our angle, it looked like he made forceable contact to the head or neck area. Of course on replay, we realized we made a mistake. Unfortunately we are human and we regret that mistake happened at such a critical juncture of the game." 

 

Agreed.

 

Instead, they might as well have said to the fans "At our angle, he made contact with the head or neck area.  On replay, it's "inconclusive".    Yeah let's go with that.   So f*ck you all."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be unpopular, but other replay angles show Burnsy making contact with Jacoby's helmet. I can take that one. The fake spike was intentional grounding and you wont convince me otherwise. 10 second runoff leaves them with 3 seconds or so and they have a timeout waiting. Homeboys 58 yd FG looked like it would have been good from 70+. Call it what you want but the team Shi+ the bed for 3 quarters and never should have been in that position. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...