Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Once And For All (Batted Passes)


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

cut blocking” is frowned upon in the NFL, so is hitting somebody in the balls. 

 

I don't care if it's frowned upon. It gets hands down almost everythime.

You can’t base your pass protection off of acting like you’re gonna hit dudes in the balls, this isn’t the longest yard.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

You can’t base your pass protection off of acting like you’re gonna hit dudes in the balls, this isn’t the longest yard.

It is a known and taught technique. It's not new. And you don’t actually have to punch in the balls except in extreme cases. Typically just hit them between the fat pad and the waistband.

 

This isn't some movie bs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

It is a known and taught technique. It's not new. And you don’t actually have to punch in the balls except in extreme cases. Typically just hit them between the fat pad and the waistband.

 

This isn't some movie bs.

Dude I played the game. I was a lineman through high school and college and I never was taught to hit people in the balls. I was different offenses and the closest thing we ever got to that was in high school we ran the flex bone and my 80 year old position coach would tell us to fire off low and put a forearm 3” above the knee cap and drive. 
 

We never practiced nut punches between chutes, sleds, and mirror drills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Dude I played the game. I was a lineman through high school and college and I never was taught to hit people in the balls. I was different offenses and the closest thing we ever got to that was in high school we ran the flex bone and my 80 year old position coach would tell us to fire off low and put a forearm 3” above the knee cap and drive. 
 

We never practiced nut punches between chutes, sleds, and mirror drills. 

I don't know why you weren't taught.

The film session someone else posted earlier and also in this thread also says the same thing.

It brings the hands down. And you don’t actually hit the balls till all else fails.

But as a lineman if you don't think you are responsible for batted passes I don't know what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yet no mention of the playcalling factoring? 

we are too RPO heavy, to short and to the outside heavy.  They require a certain throw.  Defenders know what is coming way too often. They can see the QB.  The OL can’t.   The timing gets easy. 

Need to ditch the RPO's and actually run the ball to set up play action. Zero thought was put into matching an OC with the roster or with grabbing Baker to run said OC's style of play calling. Just throwing poo at the wall out of desperation

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't making sense, because we've had way worse O-lines than we have this season, and we haven't had this problem with other QB's.  I'm not sure where the percentages of blame fall between OL and QB, but there's no way to absolve Baker of this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BIGH2001 said:

This doesn't explain the historical pace we are on for batted passes. 

Actually it definitely does.   Our oline isnt making the dline pay for stretching out to bat them down.   I'm not sure if its coaching or what.  Also it doesnt have to be in the balls, can be gut, ribs, or a hard shove the second they try to extend to bat the ball down.  Honestly it's hard for them to extend to bat the ball down if the olineman doesnt give them space as well.  There are lots of options to slow it down, and I never see us doing any of them on tape.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

You can’t base your pass protection off of acting like you’re gonna hit dudes in the balls, this isn’t the longest yard.

This made me chuckle. Nice post.   I can see Rhule reading this thread and insisting the OL spend time on the new drill he invented.  When Beker goes back to pass, everyone punch your guy in the ding ding.  
 

That’s the process at work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the ballsack punching aside…If a Dlineman leaves his feet while engaged and lands anywhere but on his back. That’s on the olineman. Bury your man, finish a block, if he jumps see how far you can toss him. The best part is it’s legal 🤷‍♂️

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't just punch defensive linemen in the balls in the nfl, which is why offensive linemen don't do this and their coaches won't let them. 

OP sounds like one of those weirdos that played a year of high school ball, sucked at it, quit because the coach was stupid, and then made fictionally hardcore elements of it his entire identity to compensate for his flagging testosterone 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...