Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFN: Increasing Communication Issues between Rhule and McAdoo


AlphabetsEnd
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean Rhule didn’t want McAdoo.   He declined him 2x for lesser roles.  McAdoo was simply all he could get when he had to hire an OC.  The league casted him out from playcalling because he was horrible.  I’m sure Rhule is thrilled his OC sucks and is worse than the newb he fired. 
 

and Rhule keeps hiring OCs that go against what he “does” and has had success.  He needs a Mike Shula type.  But he can’t even follow his own words 

No one needs a Mike Shula type. That’s just blasphemy 😑

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

No one needs a Mike Shula type. That’s just blasphemy 😑

I mean if you are a coach that wants to run and play D.   That what you would want over a McAdoo/Brady.  Shula had a great run scheme. 

I’m not making an argument that is what a modern day NFL coach should want.  It’s a passing/offensive era.   But that is what Rhule and success doing in college and claims To want to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Successful hedge fund managers accomplish their moves with positions that are contrary to market sentiment.......after they analysis a situation they turn their back on the crowd to "hedge" a position that is unpopular to those holding the current investment logic of a situation.

Think about the housing market and the hedge on it to fail in the movie "the big short".

That's how Tepper made his fortune...........being right when everyone else is wrong. A life long friend of mine was a hedge fund manager and made a fortune for his clients and himself doing this exact same thing.

Now think of what is going on right now with the Panthers and their HC.............and let that sink in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I mean if you are a coach that wants to run and play D.   That what you would want over a McAdoo/Brady.  Shula had a great run scheme. 

I’m not making an argument that is what a modern day NFL coach should want.  It’s a passing/offensive era.   But that is what Rhule and success doing in college and claims To want to be. 

Shula was the worst OC I’ve ever seen.  Give him an average QB and he doesn’t have any kind of scheme.  If anything would be worse than Rhule+McAdoo it’d be Rhule+Shula lol. I just vomited a little just thinking about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, stbugs said:

Maybe Rhule didn’t have as much of a say as people think. If Rhule is truly on the hot seat then it’s very likely he was given some ultimatums. Seems like the Fitterer apologists have stepped back from giving him credit for Baker and him getting more control, so maybe Rhule never wanted McAdoo. I mean Rhule turns him down for lesser roles. Which makes more sense? He was told to hire McAdoo or he decided to tie his future to an OC he didn’t want for lesser roles?

I don’t know the actual answer but it does seem weird to think Rhule would have hitched his wagon to McAdoo without pressure.

The OC job was essentially most likely a one year gig where you were going to look bad.  That was the job opening and everyone knew.  McAdoo was the only taker because even bad teams wouldn’t hire him.  Rhule simply had no real options.  No one young and promising was going to take the stock hit of coming here for a year and going backwards 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PghPanther said:

Successful hedge fund managers accomplish their moves with positions that are contrary to market sentiment.......after they analysis a situation they turn their back on the crowd to "hedge" a position that is unpopular to those holding the current investment logic of a situation.

Think about the housing market and the hedge on it to fail in the movie "the big short".

That's how Tepper made his fortune...........being right when everyone else is wrong. A life long friend of mine was a hedge fund manager and made a fortune for his clients and himself doing this exact same thing.

Now think of what is going on right now with the Panthers and their HC.............and let that sink in. 

What isn’t going to sink is any extra money from PSL owners   

we may be sunk on seat costs but most of us are not spending another dime at the stadium and surrounding hotels and restaurants and we are selling individual gams 

Hopefully being the laughing stock of the nfl overcomes his ego 

He best fire that talking pin head of his making or it will continue a downward spiral that isn’t recoverable 

in these hard times, not a lot of discretionary income to go around  if he wants people to part with, he best offer hope, a mea culpa, and a fresh start with a proven nfl coach and a smarty drafted rookie qb  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...