Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper is supposed to have a press conference at 345pm


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Scott Fowler can read his own column to get an idea of Tepper's timeline? Uh... what?

Well, folks. Anyone who thought Tepper may have been humbled that narrative fell apart bad down the stretch. What a fuging asshole.


Yeah, terrible look from the get go. The heat seems to be getting to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fenrir said:

Can't say it isn't deserved at this point... The questions are entirely fair, but hard to hear if you're Tepper, I'm sure. 

And Tepper never speaks to the media, so it’s not like they get a lot of opportunities to ask him questions. Guess they figured they better get it all in while they’ve got the chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, a lot to unpack there.

He all but admitted the Rhule contract was a mistake.

It sounds like Fitterer's job is in jeopardy.

It sounds like he doesn't believe we have done a good job of managing resources(draft picks, contracts, etc) in pursuit of winning now.

It sounds like we will give Wilks a chance but I don't know if he will be back, regardless.

It sounds like we might be moving players before Nov. 1.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

All you clowns hating on the media for grilling Tepper? Go lick the poo of his boots some more

For years this board would bitch and moan about the media never grilling/pressing anyone and now that they finally did (rightfully damn so) they’re mad

Because of course

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Scott Fowler can read his own column to get an idea of Tepper's timeline? Uh... what?

Well, folks. Anyone who thought Tepper may have been humbled that narrative fell apart bad down the stretch. What a fuging asshole.

Well it was till the end lol. Then that last couple of questions show something else behind the scenes too is clearly going on. He went back yall are beneath me mode at the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

I noticed a difference in tone near the end when the guy asked about tanking.  Tepper didn't catch what the guy was asking the first time (the guy didn't use the word tanking) but Tepper caught his drift when he reworded the question.  That definitely pissed him off.

I lol’d at the tanking question 

Best question all day

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

He should of held it together a little more at the end there. I will say it has to be annoying getting asked the same question over and over but in different ways. 

He could've tried actually answering the questions instead rambling like an idiot, redirecting, restating questions to buy himself more time to come up with a bullshit reply and trying to tell reporters to read their own columns in order to essentially read Tepper's mind.

That dude came across as a completely out of touch asshole over those last few minutes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Boy, a lot to unpack there.

He all but admitted the Rhule contract was a mistake.

It sounds like Fitterer's job is in jeopardy.

It sounds like he doesn't believe we have done a good job of managing resources(draft picks, contracts, etc) in pursuit of winning now.

It sounds like we will give Wilks a chance but I don't know if he will be back, regardless.

It sounds like we might be moving players before Nov. 1.

You speculated a lot, but some of this might be true. 

The media was vicious with him and for good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...