Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical QB add

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

CMC was healthy for the AZ game.  He wasn’t for the Lions game. 

and yeah, CMC did all the heavy lifting vs AZ.   He had a field day vs AZ.  And when he got to the endzone Cam got the glory.  Which is fine.   But reality is Cam wasn’t the dude who won the game.  CMC did. And AZ wasn’t stopping CMC from the 2 yard line either. 

CMC is healthy right now.   If McAdoo could actually call a good game we could be competitive.  Biggest issue right now is an OC that figure out to use the best weapon in the NFL IMO when healthy.  I mean it’s painful watching McAdoo misuse CMC.  Not the fact we have to play PJ one week.  

a healthy CMC, a good defense….and a decent OC should have us in games with meh teams.  PJ , Darnold or Baker.    If we aren’t competitive Sunday it’s because Rhule brought in joke McAdoo more than anything. 

Cool.  Anyway......back to PJ. 

If the only thing standing in the way of PJ throwing backbreaking goal-line interceptions is a healthy CMC, then that ain't exactly a glowing endorsement of the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

Running the ball is absolutely key this weekend more than any other to help PJ out and slow that rush along with tight ends learning how to catch 

helping Ickey out with chip blocking too 

in other words, McAdoo has to pretend to be a smart coordinator 

I just want a showing by a team that looks prepared 

the forecast % of a Rams win is 78.   

so many injuries on that rams oline, it is possible to win this game if defense and special teams continue to perform and if the offense is merely competent and not stupid 

it doesn’t hurt to hope that PJ does ok 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd be shocked if that turns out to be the case after how bad he looked in preseason combined with his durability concerns rearing their head.

I mean, I'd welcome it I just think it's a very long shot.

Cam looked like dog shiite in the preseason his rookie year, playing with the starters. Then went on to break rookie passing records his first 2 games. 

There's still hope for Corral - if he can stay healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Cam looked like dog shiite in the preseason his rookie year, playing with the starters. Then went on to break rookie passing records his first 2 games. 

There's still hope for Corral - if he can stay healthy. 

Cam also had elite physical tools. Other than a quick release, Corral is average at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
19 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

Cool.  Anyway......back to PJ. 

If the only thing standing in the way of PJ throwing backbreaking goal-line interceptions is a healthy CMC, then that ain't exactly a glowing endorsement of the guy.

I mean, he is a 3rd string/break the glass type QB.   

Go back and watch that Lions game.   Asking PJ to run some of the redzone plays is simply dumb.  Especially one of the INTs.   A playcaller asking a backup QB to do that?  It was a trash call for a bad QB. That’s on the OC.  Redzone is tough for all QBs.  

If you put weak QBs in bad spots? dumb predictably happens

We have a good defense and a healthy CMC.  If you can’t compete against meh teams with that combo? Your play caller is simply trash.  Which McAdoo is.   Which is now the biggest issue overall right now.  We got an OC that can’t even figure out how to use CMC.  So until can figure out the simplest of simple.  He ain’t making anyone else look good either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Cam looked like dog shiite in the preseason his rookie year, playing with the starters. Then went on to break rookie passing records his first 2 games. 

There's still hope for Corral - if he can stay healthy. 

I'm not sure that Cam looked as bad as Corral.  Cam was the Heisman trophy winner and took Auburn to the national championship on his back.    There's no comparing the two.

Corral is probably better than he looked in preseason.  He just has a long long way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...